Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   egotheistic pantheism revealed...
anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 39 of 308 (376979)
01-14-2007 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Rob
01-14-2007 1:06 PM


Re: AN ADDENDUM FOR CLARITY
Scottness writes:
in another thread, Anglagard made a comment that made me realize he felt I was misrepresenting his religion.
Scottness from the PNT:
quote:
f you are unfamilliar with pantheism, then watch the movie, 'What the Bleep do we Know'. Ramtha (as she calls herself, and who channels the Hindu God Ram) will flat out tell you, 'You are God'.
That particular movie is revealing and far more honest than the typical 'sel-described' pantheist, who is really only flirting with the concept. They posit the idea that we create our own reality, and that the problem with the world is that we need to shift from the Christian paradigm, to the 'true' paradigm.
If you are unfamiliar with Spinoza Pantheism, then read Spinoza.
Ramtha is some new age con artist. She has absolutely nothing to do with Spinoza Pantheism.
Yes, I felt that you were, and still are, misrepresenting my religion.
Edited by anglagard, : skipped a letter when doing cut n paste

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 1:06 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 4:49 PM anglagard has replied
 Message 51 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 5:05 PM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 43 of 308 (376983)
01-14-2007 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rob
01-13-2007 12:47 AM


Not Applicible #1
Scottness writes:
But the pantheist cannot take to being examined very carefully because being God, he or she does not like to be challenged. God owns Himself / Herself. He is His own. If you challenge them, they will collectively suspend your backside for speaking with disrespect to the Kings and Queens of the universe. Like they did to Jesus, they will slap you for your arrogance.
Obviously not talking about what I or Spinoza believe. Show me where either of us have claimed to be God.
Also, clearly there were no Spinoza Panthiests slapping Jesus while on earth. That is easily refuted:
From Wikipedia:
quote:
Benedictus de Spinoza or Baruch de Spinoza (Hebrew: ‘ —) (November 24, 1632 - February 21, 1677) was a Dutch philosopher of Jewish origin, considered one of the great rationalists of 17th-century philosophy and, by virtue of his magnum opus the posthumous Ethics, one of the definitive ethicists.
Was Jesus in human form on earth between 1632 and 1677?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 12:47 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 4:52 PM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 44 of 308 (376984)
01-14-2007 4:51 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Rob
01-14-2007 4:49 PM


Re: AN ADDENDUM FOR CLARITY
scottness writes:
Is your religion true?
Obviously I think so. Is yours?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 4:49 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 4:54 PM anglagard has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 50 of 308 (376992)
01-14-2007 5:00 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Rob
01-14-2007 4:54 PM


You Said It!
Scottness writes:
No, my truth cannot be true.The truth is something that I must conform to, because it precedes me.
No argument there.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 4:54 PM Rob has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 52 of 308 (376994)
01-14-2007 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rob
01-13-2007 12:47 AM


Name Calling
That is why I reject Pantheism. Because it is a fraud. An imposter that sets itself up, as the very thing it claims not to be. It opposes itself. It is a contradiction and a falsehood; a deception. It is the most exclusive of all because it calls itself the truth! It is a copy of Christianity even to the extent of each member being part of the body. Some of it is so close to Christianity that it is like the negative of a photograph.
Care to elaborate upon why you believe this way rather than just engage in a bunch of unsupported assertions?
I am pretty sure that at least in regard to Spinoza Pantheism, you don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about.
Not only that, but I also believe you will never know what you are talking about in this regard because I believe you will never read Spinoza.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 12:47 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:01 PM anglagard has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 62 of 308 (377021)
01-14-2007 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
01-14-2007 7:57 PM


What is this Thread About?
In Post 59:
Scottness writes:
Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive.
In Post 30:
Scottness writes:
This thread is about the spiritual falseness of Panthesm in the Monistic sense as a warning to those flirting with it's deception. they know who they are, and they are absent from this discussion for a reason.
So what is this thread about? Shouldn't you know?, you started it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 7:57 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:24 PM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 155 of 308 (377141)
01-15-2007 5:26 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:01 PM


Re: Name Calling
Scottness writes:
Who revealed the truth to mankind, Jesus Christ or Spinoza?
To some degree, both. They often spoke of different things or from a different perspective. I would say that Spinoza had more respect for Jesus than you do because Spinoza held "The intellectual love of God is the highest good."
Notice the term intellectual as opposed to through rote repetition of often unrelated or even misinterpreted quotes.
Matthew 24: 10 At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, 11 and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. 12 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13 but he who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. 15 "So when you see standing in the holy place 'the abomination that causes desolation,' spoken of through the prophet Daniel--let the reader understand--
From what I have seen, with the misrepresentation and obstufication, you are the one who needs to read the above more than once as you don't seem to understand what it means. After all, you are the one preaching how anyone different from yourself or who differs with your interpretation is somehow "evil."
ABE - Somehow, I did not find the central message of the NT to be "despise others as you despise yourself."
Personally, I don't think you love God as much as you think. I don't believe that there is room left for much after you first satisfy your own fragile ego with your own self-righteousness.
ABE - Have you considered defining your beliefs in a positive manner as opposed to through putting down everyone else's?
Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:01 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by Rob, posted 01-15-2007 10:25 AM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 179 of 308 (377203)
01-15-2007 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Rob
01-15-2007 11:46 AM


Mistake in Attribution
Scottness writes:
Jaderis:
ABE - Have you considered defining your beliefs in a positive manner as opposed to through putting down everyone else's?
Rob I wrote that quote you misattributed to Jaderis, you were replying to me.
Although I am flattered to be mistaken for Jaderis, please be more careful in your attributions in the future. Such sloppiness detracts from your arguments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Rob, posted 01-15-2007 11:46 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by Rob, posted 01-15-2007 8:29 PM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 181 of 308 (377209)
01-15-2007 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Rob
01-15-2007 11:46 AM


Re: The reality of evil and it's falsity of intellect
Scottness writes:
But interupting productive discussion? ...please...
If a band of thieves is carrying on in a brothel having a good time and making their plans... Do you think they would be annoyed and feel derailed to have a preacher come into their midst and remind them in point blank terms of the error of their ways?
Would they repent and accept his sound counsel?
Some will...
But many will plot in every conceivable way to undermine and discredit the preacher. And if given the chance, some will kill him if they think they can get away with it.
Mt 10:34 "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
If you put those two together, you may understand the latter for the first time...
I think the above speaks for itself in terms of mudslinging, self-righteousness, and even paranoia. Tragic in a way.
Edited by anglagard, : not add to incitement

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Rob, posted 01-15-2007 11:46 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by Rob, posted 01-15-2007 8:35 PM anglagard has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024