Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   egotheistic pantheism revealed...
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 13 of 308 (376864)
01-14-2007 1:36 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Rob
01-14-2007 1:21 AM


Re: Inclusively Exclusive
scottness writes:
Of course not, because I would remind them that if there is more than one way to God, then that excludes the belief that there is only one way to God.
Quick question; how do you deal with the philosophy of Christian Pantheism? Who is excluding who, in that case?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 1:21 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 2:04 AM anastasia has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 32 of 308 (376966)
01-14-2007 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Archer Opteryx
01-14-2007 1:04 PM


Re: panentheism
........Revelation 20:11 Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from his presence, and there was no place for them........
Archer Opterix writes:
pantheism = 'All Things are God'
panentheism = 'All Things are in God'
Orthodox Christianity = All Things are seperate from God. He can lose the heavens and the earth, and remain. He can lose the heavens and the earth and be complete.
I have read your links, Archer, two of them I had read on my own. It is a very hard distinction to make, and almost beyond my ability to express at this juncture...nonetheless there is a distinction. If there was not, we wouldn't HAVE examples of panentheistic christians, but all christians would be panentheistic.
I would not consider myself to be ...God is in all things? I would say something like "God uses all things" He works with creation, he is actively messing around with His art, but he is not exactly IN it. He is not united with it in any sense, except that His Spirit comes into us as a seperate and distinct force...He is still working with us, but not us, He is IN us, but not by nature. That's the best I can do.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-14-2007 1:04 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-15-2007 3:35 AM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 36 of 308 (376976)
01-14-2007 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Modulous
01-14-2007 4:05 PM


Re: Pantheist here
Moduolous writes:
I am a naturalistic monistic pantheist, and the concept 'I am God' is at best metaphorical. How can I be God when I am but a small part of the cosmos? That is like one of my carbon atoms saying 'I am Mod' - nonsense. It certainly holds interest as a way of looking at things, but it isn't pantheism.
That is one flaw I would have called at the outset of this topic. Not being terribly familiar with pantheism in practice, I left it up to those who are to make the call.
I think a person may say 'I am God' like an icicle saying 'I am ocean' ...'I am made of the same stuff as the ocean'...'I make up the ocean, but I am not THE ocean'?
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Modulous, posted 01-14-2007 4:05 PM Modulous has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 51 of 308 (376993)
01-14-2007 5:05 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by anglagard
01-14-2007 4:39 PM


-Spinoza-
I am not so swift, anglagard, but once you described Spinoza I finally realized who was on your avatar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by anglagard, posted 01-14-2007 4:39 PM anglagard has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 53 of 308 (376995)
01-14-2007 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Rob
01-14-2007 4:47 PM


Re: Inclusively Exclusive
scottness writes:
If Jesus says there is only one gate, and that he is that gate, then a religion that says otherwise simply must exclude that as true.
What if the religion simply says there are many paths to the gate? No matter what the gate turns out to be, or if the religion even attempts to explain, deify, personify or create the gate, they don't exclude THE gate from being true?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 4:47 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 5:25 PM anastasia has replied
 Message 61 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:10 PM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 55 of 308 (377000)
01-14-2007 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by jar
01-14-2007 5:25 PM


Re: On the Sheep.
jar writes:
Seems like Jesus is trying to tell most Christians that they don't have a clue what Salvation will depend on.
So is it wrong to think that Jesus was not talking about any religion based on Him...He is saying 'I am the gate through which salvation came to the world' so that now, whether Hindu, Muslim, etc., men can be saved?
I *think* that is what the church means by 'extra ecclesia nulla salus'. Not that only Catholic Christians will be saved, but that salvation only came to the world thru Christ.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 5:25 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 6:29 PM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 57 of 308 (377010)
01-14-2007 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by jar
01-14-2007 6:29 PM


Re: On the Sheep.
jar writes:
extra ecclesia nulla salus" is a problem for the RCC. It means that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church.
I think the interp. has changed, or there have been folks in both camps for years, or that the interpretation was a misunderstanding and conflation of the words themselves with the concept behind them.
You can go to heaven if you are not in the catholic church.
No one would go to heaven if it weren't for the catholic church.
I didn't want to get too off-topic, but I understand what you are saying.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 6:29 PM jar has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 65 of 308 (377026)
01-14-2007 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
01-14-2007 7:57 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive.
Can you explain in clear terms?
All beliefs exclude reality?
Reality is exclusive?
Reality may exclude any other reality...but are you saying all religions exclude reality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 7:57 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:15 PM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 67 of 308 (377028)
01-14-2007 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:24 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
scottness writes:
I suppose it is about the definition of religion, but in only one aspect.
So now it IS about the definition of religion?
You tell me Anglagard... Does Spinoza consider his worldview to be exclusive?
Exclusive of other religion?
Tell me again, if there are pantheist christians, how is either exclusive? Why not just a slightly different explanation into which the other can be incorporated?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:24 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:49 PM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 70 of 308 (377032)
01-14-2007 8:53 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:10 PM


Re: Inclusively Exclusive
scottness writes:
The point is, if they know the truth, then when presented with the Gospel, they will recognize Him.
You know they don't Rob. Some do, some don't. And that is because they are coming from those different cultures and starting points. I say, if they know the truth, they know it. Showing them the gospel doesn't do anything but confuse a mind that is not steeped in the same culture. It happens all the time. Showing two Europeans of the same decade the gospel doesn't even mean they will recognize the truth...heck, no one can agree on what truth is in the gospel. There CAN only be one truth, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:10 PM Rob has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 71 of 308 (377033)
01-14-2007 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:49 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
scottness writes:
I'm sure God wouldn't mind moderating his standards... they are awfully strict!
But if Christianity is God's standard, how could it be reality and yet subject to moderation?
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:49 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:19 PM anastasia has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 72 of 308 (377034)
01-14-2007 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:47 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
The Name of the Lord is many things to many languages.
scottness again writes:
So once again truth is exclusive.
Please dissemble, or tell me my brain is fried?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:47 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:28 PM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 79 of 308 (377043)
01-14-2007 9:26 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Rob
01-14-2007 9:15 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
They implicitely claim to be reality.
And this includes your religion, yes?
So you are left with proving how you know YOUR religion is reality. The law of non-contradiction is beside the point. If you prove they are all wrong, or all right, or mutually exclusive, or whatever, you can't prove which is reality.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:15 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:35 PM anastasia has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 82 of 308 (377046)
01-14-2007 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Rob
01-14-2007 9:28 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
Go back and read. Seriously, this is getting crazy!
But I did, and I have, and it is! It would be so much better if you would start with a simple belief statement. Do you include, or exclude, and if so why, and whom?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:28 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:38 PM anastasia has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5973 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 86 of 308 (377052)
01-14-2007 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Rob
01-14-2007 9:35 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
All religions imply that they are true. But if one understands that and comes right out and says it, then it understands itself. it hides nothing and is not attempting to manipulate.
You know I think your religion is closer to the truth than others, or at the very least it is my preferred path...
How does one religion openly declaring itself to be true MAKE it true? How does a religion understand itself? It is just us trying to understand God.
I really don't want to give you a hard time, just ignore me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:35 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:49 PM anastasia has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024