Post your short questions here. No need to start a thread everytime.

like the title says, i would like some please.websites and book referrals.no micro evolution (variations within a kind) jargon painted to look like macro evidence please.feed the troll please.btw by macro i mean whatever the foook you think happened to get us where we are now as humanoid.no speciation shaz either please.thanks alot i love you.

What does this have to do with my question?Maybe I'm a God-hater like you

Can I debate an evolutionist?one on one?A reply would be awesome thanks,

Here I go,Whilst reading many threads I have come to perhaps, a premature conclusion based on the review of the last few days. And that conclusion is that the majority of the users here and also the admins and mods are evolutionists.It is as if all the creationists have either deserted or been blasted away by the mighty power of the Law of Evolution. I have seen only 3 creationists post, and subsequently many evolutionist attack the poster with disdain and arrogance more fitting a small child.Also I was mocked numerous times in the chat feature by a member named Jar. I have found it difficult to start any threads due to the number of previous threads of similar topics. I came for a debate and was denied. I however, did not come to read volumes of pages of previous debates and the few I read disgusted me due to the lack of debate prowess and ignorance presented mainly by the creation minded.The lack of warmth and obvious monopoly coupled with the arrogance I since in every post leads me to the conclusion that this site is more an evolutionary think tank and not a open forum debate.To keep to the nature of the thread I will ask a question.Am I being irrational in my assessment?

Alright here I go.Based on the evidence I have studied from both sides, creation and evolution I have come to the conclusion that evolution dogma should be used only for wiping crusty bung.The idea that life evolved because gross organisms look similar and there has been some philosophizing of what would have evolved into what (phylogenic hierarchy tree of life) is completely outrageous and unscientific.Age of the Earth, evidence for evolution- radiometric dating, geologic column, fantastical fantasies.radiometric dating assumes too much and discounts theories to explain the numbers in creationist terms.geologic column is so hilarious. roflmao.fantasy- what evolutionists think and then speak and then categorize as science.can i get my debate now?

I am aware of my brevity on the topics stated. If I would have listed in detail with sources it would have taken all night. I'd much rather debate one on one.Most threads are longer than I care to read, I would like to debate someone, anyone who is willing.I'm just a stupid YEC, please purge me of my delusions! One on One preferably.I would like to start at the beginnings of the TOC and then progress from there, including all of your definitions. pe, abio, whatever.

Why aren't you the devious devil? Jockeying for a Mod position molbio?You must think you know everything so you don't need to post any threads? You follow me around and wave the rules list under my nose like you have some form of authority? And then this! lolYou should be officially warned. Is there a reason for your presence?

I was wondering why my aliens and the bible thread died? I wanted to know who believes in aliens and how that applies to their beliefs. Is it a taboo subject? Or perhaps this isn't the right forum? Would it be ok to open another thread about aliens, if I dropped the religiousism?