General discussion of moderation procedures - Part 7

quote:

---

I said nothing whatever about myself.

---

You said that you were insulted by Jazz's post because you were being "lied about or misrepresented".

OK, I read it again and I'm still right..

quote:

---

....what is there to feel insulted about.

Being lied about or misrepresented.

---

And no, it isn't presented as a hypothetical. It is presented as the reason why you are upset about Jazz's post. Edited by PaulK, : Edited to respond to Faith's editx

So it suddenly isn't a hypothetical at all. Now you want to suggest that it is a general statement that does not include you. But that reading too is not viable. You wrote that you were upset about being "lied about or misrepresented" - with nothing to hint that it refered to anyone but yourself.
n

The fact that you've tried two different - and wrong - "explanations" of a perfectly clear statement speaks for itself.You really would have done better to say that you didn't mean what you wrote. And to check it before telling others to "read it again".l

My reading's just fine. Anyone can read your post in context and see that I am correct.

quote:

---

I wrote what I meant

---

OK so you intentionally left out any suggestion that you were referring to a hypothetical. Or to fundamentalists in general rather than yourself.And since Asgara emphasised "YOU" you would have to be misreading her to think that she meant fundamentalists in general rather than you personally.But please carry on, you're doing more to dmaage the reputation of fundamentalists than Jazz's post ever could.