Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
78 online now:
jar, kjsimons, PaulK, vimesey (4 members, 74 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,122 Year: 4,234/6,534 Month: 448/900 Week: 154/150 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
Dr Jack
Member (Idle past 1337 days)
Posts: 3507
From: Leicester, England
Joined: 07-14-2003


Message 138 of 302 (276287)
01-06-2006 5:30 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Admin
01-05-2006 4:09 PM


Not for the private resolution of battles
EvC does not exist, and has never existed, for the private resolution of personal greviances. I concur with Admin.

Holmes, your behaviour with Rrhain just makes you look worse. We can judge for ourselves whether or not Rrhain is wrong without your helping hand. While it may give you personal satisfaction to settle your score with him, it does nothing to benefit EvC as either a discussion board or a community. In my opinion, therefor, the mods were right to close your thread.

Having said that I do also believe the admins should have intervened in the unseemly scrap between you and Rrhain earlier.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Admin, posted 01-05-2006 4:09 PM Admin has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by Silent H, posted 01-06-2006 6:14 AM Dr Jack has replied

Dr Jack
Member (Idle past 1337 days)
Posts: 3507
From: Leicester, England
Joined: 07-14-2003


Message 141 of 302 (276290)
01-06-2006 6:37 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by Silent H
01-06-2006 6:14 AM


Re: Not for the private resolution of battles
How did it solve the issue of resolving disputes? I have already said that I can accept the closure of the thread, but then what is the solution to the problem?

Let it go.

Honestly, I thought I was doing quite well in not responding in kind. I kept condensing posts to the prevalent points and using evidence. With the exception of some pointed commentary AFTER he began making up things to "charge" me with, I would really like to know what I did to make it unseemly.

I didn't accuse you of unseemly behaviour, I said the exchange was unseemly.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Silent H, posted 01-06-2006 6:14 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Silent H, posted 01-06-2006 7:54 AM Dr Jack has taken no action

Dr Jack
Member (Idle past 1337 days)
Posts: 3507
From: Leicester, England
Joined: 07-14-2003


Message 252 of 302 (281474)
01-25-2006 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 251 by Admin
01-25-2006 8:51 AM


Re: cool and calm discussion of issues
My advice, as always, is to just focus on the issues and ignore anything that appears like personal slights. This board isn't a marriage counseling service. Members who can't get along are encouraged to not converse with each other, or perhaps they can settle it via email. But take it somewhere else. The board is for discussion.

Hear! Hear!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Admin, posted 01-25-2006 8:51 AM Admin has taken no action

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022