Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 67 of 302 (274501)
12-31-2005 8:12 PM


In response to AdminPhat
In repsponse to your message
EvC Forum: Should a Deist pray? Response to jar's idea of God.
I do understand your concerns about the debate not advancing, but debate cannot advance when you find yourself deliberately misquoted.
Ordinarily, I would have dropped it, but since the deliberate and subsequently denied misquoting was carried out by an Admin (granted not in admin mode) who had accused me more than once in the chatroom of lying on the thread, I was not prepared to let this flagrant breach of Forum Guidelines go.
How can I debate in good faith with someone who has indulged in the dubious practice of misquoting his opponent? And how can I have any faith in the impartiality of AdminRandman if he sees it as acceptable to call his opponent a liar in the chat room (obviously leaving no record of it as he would have done had he posted it on the board)?
The next time randman indulges in deliberate misquoting, I will request Admin intervention immediately.

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by AdminPD, posted 12-31-2005 8:53 PM Trixie has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 78 of 302 (275389)
01-03-2006 3:38 PM


What is going on here?
To my statement
I'm not actually playing any game at all. I'm attempting to discuss the issue.
AdminRandman has posted the following message in the thread "Man raised back to life in Jesus' name"
You are an intelligent enough person to see that you are not just attempting to discuss the issue, or you would treat Faith and others a little differently.
If you are going to say my comments are like the pot calling the kettle black or some such, I will not defend myself, but still what I say to you above needs to be said.
See here
I see this as an accusation that I am being untruthful when I state that I'm not playing games, ie AdminRandman thinks I'm lying and has stated this in public, as an Admin.
Nowhere in the thread did I treat Faith with anything but respect and I will contrast that with her treatment of myself and Percy when he intervened as Admin. I withdrew from the thread because of the abuse I received from Faith rather than have it degenerate into a slanging match. And who are the "others" that AdminRandman refers to?
Since when did it become part of the Forum Guidelines that you don't accuse someone of lying unless you're AdminRandman?
Since when did it become part of the Forum Guidelines that asking questions of people will not be tolerated?
Since when did it become part of the Forum Guidelines that explaining your own beliefs from your own perspective counts as treating people badly?

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Faith, posted 01-03-2006 3:56 PM Trixie has not replied
 Message 144 by Trixie, posted 01-06-2006 4:33 PM Trixie has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 80 of 302 (275404)
01-03-2006 4:09 PM


Admin action please
Once more an accusation of lying, see message above from Faith, where it states
You received no "abuse." That IS a lie.

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Faith, posted 01-04-2006 2:24 PM Trixie has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 83 of 302 (275421)
01-03-2006 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by AdminPD
01-03-2006 4:35 PM


Re: Time to Confer
I'd appreciate you also looking at my message 78 in this thread which started the ball rolling here. It was a request for Admin to have a look at a specific reply to me by AdminRandman.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by AdminPD, posted 01-03-2006 4:35 PM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by AdminPD, posted 01-03-2006 5:25 PM Trixie has replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 87 of 302 (275472)
01-03-2006 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by AdminPD
01-03-2006 5:25 PM


Re: Conflict Resolution Thread
I've already stated that I have withdrawn from the thread in question as I have no desire to take part in an uncivil discussion. That is my conflict resolution - I'm refusing to be drawn into it.
My intention in posting in the General Discussion of Moderation Procedures was to bring attention to the post by AdminRandman, not the posts by Faith. That Faith chose to reply to my post here is nothing to do with me and, other than drawing attention to being accused of lying, I have not responded to her OT post.
I see no benefit in having a discussion with Faith as the conflict which has raised it's head here is her statement that I have lied. That is against Forum Guidelines and as such it is not for me to attempt to resolve that conflict.
I do appreciate the suggestion and in different circumstances it may be an excellent way of resolving conflicts which don't actually involve breaches of Forum Guidelines. Sadly, in these circumstances, I don't see it working.
I may be wrong and someone may be able to suggest to me a different way of looking at this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by AdminPD, posted 01-03-2006 5:25 PM AdminPD has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 144 of 302 (276460)
01-06-2006 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Trixie
01-03-2006 3:38 PM


Re: What is going on here?
Bump, since I haven't had any feedback on this Message 78

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Trixie, posted 01-03-2006 3:38 PM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by AdminRandman, posted 01-06-2006 5:59 PM Trixie has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 158 of 302 (276710)
01-07-2006 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by AdminPD
01-07-2006 7:28 AM


Re: Conflict Resolution Thread
For crying out loud!!! When is anyone going to notice that I'm asking for Admin to look at what AdminRandman said and did! It has nothing to do with Faith or what she said about me, that's dealt with. I just accept that as Faith being Faith. Adminrandman stepped in and had a go at me when I had done nothing! On top of that, while "moderating" he was accusing me of lying.
How many times do I have to point this out before someone actually bothers to read what I've written?
Added by edit: On the slim chance that anyone is going to bother checking this out, it's Message 78 in this thread.
This message has been edited by Trixie, 01-07-2006 03:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by AdminPD, posted 01-07-2006 7:28 AM AdminPD has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by AdminNWR, posted 01-07-2006 3:47 PM Trixie has replied
 Message 161 by Adminnemooseus, posted 01-07-2006 3:55 PM Trixie has not replied
 Message 165 by roxrkool, posted 01-07-2006 6:23 PM Trixie has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 160 of 302 (276715)
01-07-2006 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by AdminNWR
01-07-2006 3:47 PM


Thank you!!
At least I don't feel ignored anymore. Once again, thank you nwr.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by AdminNWR, posted 01-07-2006 3:47 PM AdminNWR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by Admin, posted 01-09-2006 5:45 PM Trixie has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024