Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2493 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 19 of 302 (273241)
12-27-2005 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by AdminNWR
12-27-2005 10:58 AM


Nuggin's 2cs
While I wasn't offended by Mark's input, I think that the content deleted solution is probably the best one.
If someone has input for the debate, they should feel free to email the parties involved, or, as was done in another debate, start a peanut gallery thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by AdminNWR, posted 12-27-2005 10:58 AM AdminNWR has not replied

Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2493 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 49 of 302 (274234)
12-30-2005 2:59 PM


Pls Boot Herepton
This kind of comment has no place on the boards:
Why the Admins have not booted your stupid ass to Boot Camp is beyond me
Please remove him

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by AdminNosy, posted 12-30-2005 3:25 PM Nuggin has not replied

Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2493 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 201 of 302 (277898)
01-10-2006 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by randman
01-10-2006 5:49 PM


Re: I'd like to comment...
Welcome back, Randman
I was worried when I saw that you were banned. There has to be at least someone to argue with, otherwise the board is boring.
On Jerry Springer:
The quote is mine It's from a thread specifically discussing the method by which the debate is addressed. I was not refering to the Creationists as members of the Jerry Springer audience. I was refering to the American Public as the audience. An analogy I stand by. (After all, they are his audience)
Too often public debate on this subject (or any subject) is reduced to three word slogans that fit on protest signs.
If we are to have a scientific debate, both sides need to address science - not sound bites.
Additionally, I'd like to draw a distinction between generalizing the kind of debate/tactics being used by a side and an attack on a particular person from that side. (though, I have seen you be admonished for refering to tactics as I did here).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by randman, posted 01-10-2006 5:49 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by Wounded King, posted 01-11-2006 6:37 PM Nuggin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024