Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,837 Year: 4,094/9,624 Month: 965/974 Week: 292/286 Day: 13/40 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Feature Requests and Suggestions Thread
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 165 of 236 (254029)
10-22-2005 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by Ben!
10-22-2005 2:37 PM


Re: HTML Tags: BLINK and MARQUEE
What Flintstone browser are you using that recognizes the BLINK tag?

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by Ben!, posted 10-22-2005 2:37 PM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by Ben!, posted 10-22-2005 3:08 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 167 of 236 (254032)
10-22-2005 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Ben!
10-22-2005 3:08 PM


Re: HTML Tags: BLINK and MARQUEE
So, this post is really annoying to you, is what you're saying? (For any lurkers who are not using Firefox: this paragraph is supposedly blinking.)
(Edited to remove BLINK tags.)
Do people actually do that? I mean, other than me (my middle name is "annoying").
But seriously, how can you consider Firefox "more advanced", when it dredges up long-discarded things like BLINK? I don't even know what BLINK looks like - unless I pull Firefox out of the recycle bin....
Is it really necessary to disable BLINK? Or to put up signs saying "No Parking for Zeppelins"?
This message has been edited by Ringo316, 2005-10-22 09:04 PM

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Ben!, posted 10-22-2005 3:08 PM Ben! has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by nwr, posted 10-22-2005 3:52 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 169 of 236 (254039)
10-22-2005 4:03 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by nwr
10-22-2005 3:52 PM


Re: HTML Tags: BLINK and MARQUEE
Wow. Giant leap backward.
I did a Frankenstein on my Firefox just to see it. Never thought I'd see such a thing outside the Museum of Paleontology.
Move ahead to the twentieth century, Firefox.

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by nwr, posted 10-22-2005 3:52 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by Yaro, posted 10-22-2005 4:17 PM ringo has replied
 Message 171 by nwr, posted 10-22-2005 4:19 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 172 of 236 (254042)
10-22-2005 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by Yaro
10-22-2005 4:17 PM


Re: HTML Tags: BLINK and MARQUEE
Yaro writes:
Have fun with your popups, ads, alexa, treacker bots, activx....
I never have trouble with those things - all easily sorted. And what fun is life without a little wildlife, anyway?
... general web non-conformity.
Non-conformist? Moi? (How did you guess? )

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Yaro, posted 10-22-2005 4:17 PM Yaro has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 173 of 236 (254045)
10-22-2005 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by nwr
10-22-2005 4:19 PM


Re: HTML Tags: BLINK and MARQUEE
If people to create really horrible web pages, we should allow web surfers to see how really horrible they are.
I had never even seen a blink before today and I still see a lot of "really horrible" web pages. People can do "really horrible" things with fully compliant, "conformist" pages. There's no excuse for implementing a tag that has no redeeming qualities.

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by nwr, posted 10-22-2005 4:19 PM nwr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024