General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 11.0

Nosy:Now that's rich...I was actually very much sticking (after a brief departure into preaching which was adequately dealt with by said Admin) to the topic of origins. Right on the topic in fact. What I wasn't doing... was offering ideas on how to synthesize nucleotides.If your going to ban me from origin of life discussions, please do so on that basis. For simply being off topic for the sub-topic (a pattern that I confess persists). Ban me for refusal to bow in submission to your 'theo' and it's stringent and incoruptable rules. Holiness is not something I am supposed to violate!What I was doing, was showing the blatent inablity of the problem being solved. I was also exposing evolution for the fraud that it is in temrs of 'emperical credibility'. And the true reason for my banishment from the arena of ideas, is for the simple reason that I am continuing and learning to do so, effectively.I refuse to take the mark, play by unfair rules and presuppositional bias, and am therefore not permitted to buy or sell or trade in the marketplace of EVC. Such is the nature of the beast.So be it...The rest of you beware. Either be beaten into submission and chained like some 'mind slave' to demigods like Nosy Ned, or learn to think for yourself.No trying to 'prove' anything here... but it's definitely fascinating.Then again, maybe it's all just coincidence...All of this will easily enough be cast aside as the rant of a mad man. Don't worry Ned, your have them right where you want them; under your thumb.I think I was beginning to lift the veil in a couple cases. You stepped in, right in the nick of time...It was a close one...So, good luck to all the newbie creationists... it's gonna be a long ride for you here at EVC.It will temper you or break you. Erring now on the side of temperment, you'll start out optimistic, be severely dissapointed, learn more than you could possibly imagine in a very short time about your adversary, you'll marvel at the beast, and then eventually walk away, laughing at it's incompetance and obstinance.Yet always be willing to reach out again and tell the truth...I guess molbiogirl, Doddy, Matt P, and Kuresu are not strong enough in the mind of Nosy to keep me under control. Do you four concur?Perhaps I Am the beast who needs to be banished in the end. One thing is certain; a beast will be banished.As other members and past members of EVC have told me privately... it's the same old thing. It's truely fascinating.Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

I will not argue with you about it here. I did my best to put it into my own words, but you don't like that even though you'
ve asked me in the past to do just that.Would you like an atheistic/agnostic scientists view on the matter? Because you always gloss right over that. It's been mentioned before and simply ignored. This is where I originally discovered the connection.It doesn't mean evolution is not true Kuresu, it only means it has yet to be proven; that it is thus far only 'theo'. You really must relax.Paul Davies, theoretical physicist / Australian Centre for Astrobiology:

​

Davies on the question: ”Does the monotheistic tradition of an intelligible universe have any impact on modern science?’ Ok Nosy, he did his job again on cue... now get the axe. Or is there a Judas among us who will do the deed in exchange for acceptance within the united body of EVC. It would look so much better if a creo admin did the deed you know?

Let's repectfully take our debate somewhere else...http://EvC Forum: misc lexeme morpholgy and semantic theory -->EvC Forum: misc lexeme morpholgy and semantic theory