Faith,
Most of what you write about evolution is distorted by the creationist lens you are peering through. I think that ultimately all creationist arguments are flawed. But that's what this whole forum is about: discussion between creationists and 'evolutionists' (for want of a better word). So I cannot quite understand why this question of what to do with you crops up at all.
Your post are not constructive, says one. But I have learned a lot from looking up things you and your opponents have brought up in discussion. I call that constructive.
You post count is too high, says another. Well, your count may be high, but your posting rate, i.e. the average number of posts per day since registering - a much more interesting statistic in my opinion - is just below that of your accuser, Schrafinator. The member with the highest post count (Crashfrog) has a posting rate just less than twice yours and the member with the second highest post count (Jar) is a machine gun compared to you. (But that's understandable, because he's from Texas.)
What you write is creationist rubbish, but it's well-written rubbish and I read your posts for the sheer enjoyment of language. In that respect, you are up there with the best of them.
Please stay.
Edited by Parasomnium, : No reason given.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science." - Charles Darwin.