Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,435 Year: 3,692/9,624 Month: 563/974 Week: 176/276 Day: 16/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Faith's Participation in EvC
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 265 of 285 (354978)
10-07-2006 12:25 PM


A Q and A with myself
Let's see:
Should Faith be allowed to carry on posting?
Yes.
That's a surprising answer from you - why do you say that?
Because she's one of the best examples of how morally and intellectually bankrupt the creationist position is. The more posts she makes, the more there are to link to for the unconvinced (waste of time appealing to those convinced on both sides).
So she's overall a good presence on the board?
Not really - the problem with her imput is that every thread she appears on degrades into another thread about faith herself and her belief, any real debate comes out of the window. she's like a blackhole that sucks in any passing light - of course she has not got that way on her own, everyone her has helped to create that blackhole.
So does bad debate drive out good?
I'm not sure but let me give you some anecdotal evidence. In the past I have had offboard email contact with a number of long-term members of the boards - people with strong scientific backgrounds who no longer post. They don't post because they got sick of being dragged down the same deadend on every thread, they got sick of having their expertise rubbished. They got sick of the bullshit to be perfectly honest.
So what's the answer?
There isn't one - Faith loves the attention (for whatever reason) too much to cut her posting down to a sensible manageable number of threads - she's an addict, she loves the feel of her hairshirt and her position as number one christian martyr on the boards. This issue will not be settled by this thread or any other threads on the matter.
But many people have said her debating has gone a lot better since she first got here?
Not really - the rhetoric and her grasp of debating tactics have got significantly better but she has not shifted one inch in her outlook and willingness to listen (she's not willing). Her position on day 1 was that the bible is true because the bible says it's true (she's say this is an incorrect reading of her position - it's not) and therefore any evidence that suggests differently is incorrect. I've seen the same points explained to her over and over for the last few years - I've never seen any evidence that she is even willing to listen to what she is told - if it does not fit 100% with the bible - it's wrong and to be discarded.
What does this mean for debate in the science forums?
It means that debate is actually impossible - she is constantly remained that the science forums are for science - it never happens, it all leads straight back to the bible. Forgetting her actual position for a minute, why is she unable to follow the rules in that forum?
I would suggest either she has mental or learning difficulties and is unable to grasp it or she grasps it but because she knows that she supplies most of the creationist posts on the boards feels she is untouchable. Moreover, it's a wonderful forum to play into her addiction, she knows the response her posts are going to get and it makes that hairshirt itch in that delightful manner. Many fundies seem to get an almost sexual thrill from thinking they are being hounded and persecuted - they seem to seek it out like Faith does.
Edited by CK, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by iano, posted 10-07-2006 1:02 PM CK has replied
 Message 269 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-07-2006 2:48 PM CK has not replied
 Message 279 by Faith, posted 10-08-2006 12:16 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 268 of 285 (354984)
10-07-2006 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 266 by iano
10-07-2006 1:02 PM


Re: Banzai!!
actually I have been silent fullstop - I'm too busy in the real world to do much more than lurk.
you only get those odd posts because it kills deadtime on the train or right at the moment on the bus (off for a drink)
Edited by CK, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by iano, posted 10-07-2006 1:02 PM iano has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 276 of 285 (355139)
10-08-2006 7:43 AM
Reply to: Message 275 by PaulK
10-08-2006 7:25 AM


Re: The wrong idea of fairness
Paul - I would point out that such a discussion is off-topic for this thread.
It is not however going to be off-topic for this topic.....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by PaulK, posted 10-08-2006 7:25 AM PaulK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 281 of 285 (355217)
10-08-2006 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 280 by NosyNed
10-08-2006 12:43 PM


Re: Where can the debate go?
Ned hits on a very important point. If you are explaining a point to user X and User X says "oh I need to think more about this", then you feel you are enganged in useful discourse. However when you explain the same point to user X over and over and over and over again and user X keeps implying that you don't know what you are talking about/you are lying/you have your secret atheist bias/you are not a true christian and then also refuses to read any of the material you suggest or even consider reading it - that's hard work.
Dealing with that one individual over and over again is far more likely to get people to stop posting than posting the same point to 100 different people.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 280 by NosyNed, posted 10-08-2006 12:43 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 282 by Admin, posted 10-09-2006 8:33 AM CK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024