Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-16-2019 1:05 AM
31 online now:
DrJones*, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), PaulK (3 members, 28 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: lopezeast0211
Happy Birthday: Theodoric
Post Volume:
Total: 856,807 Year: 11,843/19,786 Month: 1,624/2,641 Week: 133/708 Day: 0/67 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution
wj
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 300 (237867)
08-27-2005 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by AdminJar
08-27-2005 9:16 PM


Re: Enough folk.
Again it appears that Faith is being provided with unjustified lenience. Other posters in this thread have given examples of inappropriate postings by Faith but Admin choose to offer no admonishment or even comment. I think that admin should keep Faith on a short leash rather than shoot the messenger.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by AdminJar, posted 08-27-2005 9:16 PM AdminJar has not yet responded

wj
Inactive Member


Message 81 of 300 (240305)
09-03-2005 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Admin
09-03-2005 3:50 PM


Re: complete evo hypocrisy
Feel the hypocrisy. Randman raises questions of evolutionists which they are unable to answer truthfully and then they call on moderators to lock randman out so that the dishonesty and propoganda of evolution can be protected. Its all a conspiracy against randman and the truth (interchangeable terms). And there should be more transitional fossils. There are no transitional forms. The fossil record is complete, all the fossils have been found. Pakicetus was not a whale!!!!!!!!!!!!

Missing him already.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Admin, posted 09-03-2005 3:50 PM Admin has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by nwr, posted 09-04-2005 1:49 AM wj has responded

wj
Inactive Member


Message 83 of 300 (240343)
09-04-2005 4:41 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by nwr
09-04-2005 1:49 AM


Re: Setting the record straight.
Who said yanks were sarcasm challenged?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by nwr, posted 09-04-2005 1:49 AM nwr has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by DBlevins, posted 09-04-2005 7:24 AM wj has not yet responded

wj
Inactive Member


Message 85 of 300 (240507)
09-05-2005 7:07 AM


Omnivorous ban
Adminben's indefinite suspension of Omnivorous is excessive.
Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by arachnophilia, posted 09-05-2005 7:33 AM wj has not yet responded
 Message 91 by Michael, posted 09-05-2005 8:36 AM wj has responded

wj
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 300 (241211)
09-08-2005 1:47 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by Michael
09-05-2005 8:36 AM


Re: Omnivorous ban
No, Michael, not sarcasm. Faith gets the privelige of making offensive and immoral assetions and someone loses his cool. The letter deserrves indefinite banning whilst the former is given lenient forgiveness each time she degenerates into similar but unprovoked behaviour. The double standard from Adminben is getting tiresome. The net result will be frustration for those who normally abide by the rules when they see double standard is shortsighted and ethically indefensible.

Note that this is written after Omnivorous has been restored.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Michael, posted 09-05-2005 8:36 AM Michael has not yet responded

wj
Inactive Member


Message 96 of 300 (241213)
09-08-2005 1:56 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by AdminBen
09-05-2005 9:04 AM


Re: Let's not go there
AdminBen writes:

This thread is not a peanut gallery where we opine about moderator action.

Have you lost the plot? Dissuading feedback from members like this will lead to moderators becoming insular and isolated from the views of other members - not a healty thing, unless the owner of the boards wants to indulge himself in that way but it could get rather lonely.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by AdminBen, posted 09-05-2005 9:04 AM AdminBen has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by AdminBen, posted 09-08-2005 8:13 AM wj has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019