Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8986 total)
47 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, jar, Pollux, xongsmith (4 members, 43 visitors)
Newest Member: Base12
Post Volume: Total: 877,910 Year: 9,658/23,288 Month: 673/1,544 Week: 65/322 Day: 65/58 Hour: 0/4

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member

Message 202 of 300 (251096)
10-12-2005 10:27 AM

thread reopen request
In Message 104 I broke the rules and did some name calling and Phat shut the thread down. I guess I'm being a little too idealistic but I would still like to see Faith substantiate a, I mean any, claim she has made. In my attempts to do this I have quoted the Bible, to which she dodged, and then I tried to mirror her tactics, which was too inneffective at showing how full-o-crap she is. Now I finally think we are getting to the crux of her position and all of my efforts will be in vain if the thread remains closed (or if she doesn't reply). Leaving the thread closed not only lets her get away with murder, it perpetuated the problem that people have with her. My final tactic was indeed name calling, but I'm just trying to fire her up a bit so maybe she'll throw a post out there that actually says something. I'll go edit the name calling out of my message to make it presentable.

ABE: I guess I can't edit it because it is closed.

This message has been edited by Catholic Scientist, 10-12-2005 09:29 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by Faith, posted 10-12-2005 10:47 AM New Cat's Eye has not yet responded
 Message 205 by AdminBen, posted 10-12-2005 11:20 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member

Message 213 of 300 (251144)
10-12-2005 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by AdminBen
10-12-2005 11:20 AM

Re: thread reopen request
Requests for thread reopenings should go to the "Thread Reopen Requests" thread.

lol, that makes sence. I honestly didn't see it.

At first I thought you were complaining about how AdminPhat handled the situation.

Nah, I figured the name calling would get noticed. I just felt like I had her on her heals and was gonna make some progress and then it gets shut down and now I'll probably never get the reply I wanted to see. But if she thinks she is just beating a dead horse the reply might have been worthless anyways.

After reading the thread subtitle (somehow the last thing I read) I'm pretty sure you're just asking for the thread to be reopened.

Is that right?


I cannot believe and am angered by Faith replying to the message and it took all of my willpower to not reply back which I realized would just bring the debate to this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by AdminBen, posted 10-12-2005 11:20 AM AdminBen has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by AdminBen, posted 10-12-2005 12:41 PM New Cat's Eye has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020