Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8994 total)
61 online now:
jar, Juvenissun, PaulK (3 members, 58 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,321 Year: 11,069/23,288 Month: 321/1,763 Week: 288/390 Day: 9/99 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8939
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 113 of 300 (242000)
09-09-2005 9:04 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Ben!
09-09-2005 8:14 PM


Another path to a correct hypothesis?
Who ever told you science was the only way to find a correct hypothesis given a set of data?

Something like this gets said here every few weeks. How about opening a PNT in "Is it science?" and suggesting a different way of arriving at something that has a reasonable chance of being correct?

No one ever does.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Ben!, posted 09-09-2005 8:14 PM Ben! has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Ben!, posted 09-09-2005 10:07 PM NosyNed has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020