Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,783 Year: 4,040/9,624 Month: 911/974 Week: 238/286 Day: 45/109 Hour: 2/5


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Suggestions and Questions ⇒

General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 113 of 300 (242000)
09-09-2005 9:04 PM 		Reply to: Message 111 by Ben!
09-09-2005 8:14 PM

Another path to a correct hypothesis?
Who ever told you science was the only way to find a correct hypothesis given a set of data?
​
Something like this gets said here every few weeks. How about opening a PNT in "Is it science?" and suggesting a different way of arriving at something that has a reasonable chance of being correct?
​
No one ever does.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Ben!, posted 09-09-2005 8:14 PM Ben! has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Ben!, posted 09-09-2005 10:07 PM NosyNed has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024