Report discussion problems here: No.2

You did an excellent job, Blue Jay.I did not expect Faith to accept evidence that she could not fit with her creationist views. But you did present the evidence well. You should not consider your efforts as a failure. I certainly think of them as a success, in that Faith had to confront the evidence, even if she would not accept it.And I am probably breaking some rule by posting this here. But I'll take my chances with that, because I think you needed some positive feedback.

The spam links are still there. Putting them there to boost google ratings was probably the whole point of the spam.

New member teddy33 seems to be posting inane comments, and using a signature with several spam links.

I read that, in context, as a touch of sarcasm but not as an insult.

As I said in Message 131, dkroemer comes across as sounding like a martian.You are doing fine.Earlier today, I was sorely tempted to quote mine (take out of context) his "my arguments are irrational" from the last line of Message 256. For that sums up how I see his arguments.I'm not sure why you think this a reportable discussion problem.

"something amazing." is spam.

That should be Message 1. The users profile url is the spam link.