Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report discussion problems here: No.2
paullesq 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5461 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-06-2009


Message 90 of 468 (505385)
04-10-2009 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Stagamancer
04-09-2009 12:11 AM


Re: Spam-ish
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The last post by paullesq had a link to a Carly Simon video on youtube. I may be stating the obvious when I say that it had nothing to do with the thread
...........................
Even Mussilini let them dance arround the maypole.
[sit com. Dinner ladies].
paul

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Stagamancer, posted 04-09-2009 12:11 AM Stagamancer has not replied

paullesq 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5461 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-06-2009


Message 91 of 468 (505386)
04-10-2009 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by CosmicChimp
04-09-2009 12:27 AM


Re: Spam-ish
google paullesq and you can see he gets kicked out of a few forums for the same BS topic he has running here...
........................
No just one forum Dawkins, i was kicked out for making a statement.
Have you read it?
paul.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by CosmicChimp, posted 04-09-2009 12:27 AM CosmicChimp has seen this message but not replied

paullesq 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5461 days)
Posts: 43
Joined: 04-06-2009


Message 93 of 468 (505549)
04-13-2009 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by Admin
04-13-2009 10:14 AM


Re: Response to Paullesq
It seems to me that you have focussed on the call to think deeper and not the theory.
Admin writes:
Yes, that's correct. That's because I'm moderating, not discussing. It's my job to focus on adherence to the Forum Guidelines and not on the specific technical details of the discussion. It is my judgement that what you're labelling a "call to think deeper" is an off-topic distraction. The obvious and equally inappropriate response is, "No, you're the one not thinking deeply enough," taking the discussion down an off-topic rat hole.
I also suggest again that you use dBCodes for quoting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You went from being moderator to debater when you made the 'inarticulate proposition' jibe.
If you are moderating and skim reading the content of my posts then it is understandable how you reached that conclusion and made the charge. The call to think more deeply was a relevant to the debate because of the newness of the idea. There are thinkers here in your EvC forum and perhaps you see yourself as defending them when there is really no need. The call to think more deeply was supposed to be just a subject in passing.
....................................................
My home pc has given up the ghost that is why i am unable to use dBCodes, hopefully this glich will be rectified by the end of next week.
paul.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Admin, posted 04-13-2009 10:14 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Admin, posted 04-13-2009 11:26 AM paullesq has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024