It seems to me that you have focussed on the call to think deeper and not the theory.
Admin writes:
Yes, that's correct. That's because I'm moderating, not discussing. It's my job to focus on adherence to the Forum Guidelines and not on the specific technical details of the discussion. It is my judgement that what you're labelling a "call to think deeper" is an off-topic distraction. The obvious and equally inappropriate response is, "No, you're the one not thinking deeply enough," taking the discussion down an off-topic rat hole.
I also suggest again that you use dBCodes for quoting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You went from being moderator to debater when you made the 'inarticulate proposition' jibe.
If you are moderating and skim reading the content of my posts then it is understandable how you reached that conclusion and made the charge. The call to think more deeply was a relevant to the debate because of the newness of the idea. There are thinkers here in your EvC forum and perhaps you see yourself as defending them when there is really no need. The call to think more deeply was supposed to be just a subject in passing.
....................................................
My home pc has given up the ghost that is why i am unable to use dBCodes, hopefully this glich will be rectified by the end of next week.
paul.