Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,398 Year: 3,655/9,624 Month: 526/974 Week: 139/276 Day: 13/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures - Part οκτώ
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 302 (350718)
09-20-2006 3:00 PM


This is the place to comment on moderation procedures.
The following are the 7 previous "General discussion on moderation procedures" topics, from earliest to most recent:
Change in Moderation?
General discussion of moderation procedures
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Sequel
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
General discussion of moderation procedures - Part 7
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Added list of previous topics.

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Rob, posted 11-03-2006 4:05 PM AdminJar has replied
 Message 258 by Brad McFall, posted 12-19-2006 4:26 PM AdminJar has not replied

AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 302 (353003)
09-28-2006 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by robinrohan
09-28-2006 10:47 PM


Re: AdminPD's warnings are misguided
Read the OP. Saw nothing there to suggest that dumb equaled morality. AdminPD was right on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by robinrohan, posted 09-28-2006 10:47 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by robinrohan, posted 09-28-2006 10:55 PM AdminJar has not replied

AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 302 (359116)
10-26-2006 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by kuresu
10-26-2006 6:33 PM


Re: to jar: thread on new logo
Yeah, I saw your post and ianos. I did not try to follow it back up thread.
Let's just stick to the logos.

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
    See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]


  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 42 by kuresu, posted 10-26-2006 6:33 PM kuresu has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 44 by kuresu, posted 10-26-2006 6:40 PM AdminJar has replied

    AdminJar
    Inactive Member


    Message 45 of 302 (359118)
    10-26-2006 6:43 PM
    Reply to: Message 44 by kuresu
    10-26-2006 6:40 PM


    Re: to jar: thread on new logo
    Because you are getting into debating Evolution, Creationism, Evolutionism, Creation and NOT the logos. Your post was leading us OT as evidenced by ianos response.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 44 by kuresu, posted 10-26-2006 6:40 PM kuresu has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 47 by kuresu, posted 10-26-2006 6:47 PM AdminJar has not replied

    AdminJar
    Inactive Member


    Message 78 of 302 (360156)
    10-31-2006 2:26 PM
    Reply to: Message 77 by Silent H
    10-31-2006 2:22 PM


    Re: problem report
    Ignore him.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 77 by Silent H, posted 10-31-2006 2:22 PM Silent H has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 79 by Silent H, posted 10-31-2006 2:33 PM AdminJar has not replied

    AdminJar
    Inactive Member


    Message 102 of 302 (361163)
    11-03-2006 4:11 PM
    Reply to: Message 101 by Rob
    11-03-2006 4:05 PM


    sorry but you are off topic there
    stick to science in that thread. Your flights of fantasy do not touch on science.

    Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
    See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]


  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 101 by Rob, posted 11-03-2006 4:05 PM Rob has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 103 by Rob, posted 11-03-2006 4:26 PM AdminJar has not replied

    AdminJar
    Inactive Member


    Message 127 of 302 (361911)
    11-05-2006 3:38 PM
    Reply to: Message 126 by berberry
    11-05-2006 3:25 PM


    Re: AdminOmni
    I think all of us agree that NJ make a damn fool of himself and showed that he is at heart a bigot. But I don't think we should stop people from saying such things. He did not address an individual. It was addressed to a group. He does have the right to be a fool. It is not at all like other really nasty comments made here at EvC even about specific members that are allowed to stand even though equally offensive. After all, iano as one example, said that I should be taken out and shot. Now that is personal and yet was allowed to stand. The reason was that it simply showed the world the total bankruptcy of his position.

    Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
    See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]


  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 126 by berberry, posted 11-05-2006 3:25 PM berberry has not replied

    AdminJar
    Inactive Member


    Message 159 of 302 (362143)
    11-06-2006 12:04 PM
    Reply to: Message 153 by berberry
    11-06-2006 9:43 AM


    Re: Faith's suspension
    I think Faith is about the most valuable creo we have on this forum, not least of all because I think she's been very fair as an admin. I think she's been both more active and more fair than anyone expected, and the fact that she's a creo I think helps this forum to establish a reputation for generally even-handed moderation.
    Unfortunately, that was a big part of the problem. Faith simply would not Admin and even admitted she could not Admin without bias.
    Faith writes:
    I'm not really into moderating at all, Nosy, I'm sorry. I find it very hard to follow the arguments of some of the creationists who come here, but also, I'm afraid I don't want to ride herd on other creationists at all, even if they are very far off course.
    Part of working as an Admin is to try to behave fairly. Hell, we all fail at it, but really, we do try. When an Admin flat comes out and says that they will not respond to one segment of the membership even when they are way over the line, Percy has to question their suitability for the job.
    Being an Admin is often not pleasant. Often we have to take positions we really dislike, for example a couple times I personally have had to sanction you even though I agreed completely with your position. One time it was "There but by the Grace of God" because I was getting ready to respond just as you had when I came across your response. You said what needed to be said even though it broke the rules. Had you been any slower in responding it would have been me getting the warning instead of you.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 153 by berberry, posted 11-06-2006 9:43 AM berberry has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 163 by arachnophilia, posted 11-06-2006 8:49 PM AdminJar has not replied

    AdminJar
    Inactive Member


    Message 186 of 302 (363076)
    11-10-2006 1:11 PM
    Reply to: Message 185 by Taz
    11-10-2006 1:05 PM


    Is there a reason why you guys don't IP ban?
    In some cases we do. However most ips are dynamically assigned anyway. Even if they are static, the kid can just register from a friends or at work or at school which will show as a different ip.
    We try to be fair to the majority. And usually we catch folk pretty quickly using other methods. It does not seem to be fair to ban a dynamic ip that might actually be yours after the next lease.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 185 by Taz, posted 11-10-2006 1:05 PM Taz has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024