Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 75 (8963 total)
213 online now:
Coragyps, jar, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), ringo (5 members, 208 visitors)
Newest Member: Samuel567
Upcoming Birthdays: CosmicChimp
Post Volume: Total: 870,839 Year: 2,587/23,288 Month: 778/1,809 Week: 210/225 Day: 23/46 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Topic Proposal Issues
kuresu
Member (Idle past 925 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 238 of 507 (428780)
10-17-2007 4:12 PM


Simple's Cold Earth Core thread
I'd really like to see him explain why the earth has a cold core. I have a ton of questions for him to consider, plus the fact that the earth's core is hot can be determined by "present state science" and that this core actually exists in the present.

All his objections are based off of natural laws not applying down there (yet he has no reason) or that our assumption of heat is based off of past (and even totally unrelated events).

I'm willing to do a great debate if you all don't want it opened to the whole community. I also don't think he should go unchallenged with his assumptions and "logic".

Kuresu


"Have the Courage to Know!" --Immanuel Kant

" One useless man is a disgrace. Two are called a law firm. Three or more are called a congress" --paraphrased, John Adams

Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.


Replies to this message:
 Message 239 by Admin, posted 10-18-2007 10:19 AM kuresu has not yet responded
 Message 242 by NosyNed, posted 10-18-2007 2:50 PM kuresu has responded

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 925 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 243 of 507 (429091)
10-18-2007 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by NosyNed
10-18-2007 2:50 PM


Re: Simple's Cold Earth Core thread
He may not learn anything from the debate, but hopefully those who watch will. And what they would learn is why Simple is wrong.

Simple can shout "VICTORY" all day long, but as ray so loves to put: "objective people will see who has won (paraphrased)".

I do believe it is largely for this reason that Anglagard tackled S1WC and RAZD tackled Simple in their respective Great Debate threads.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by NosyNed, posted 10-18-2007 2:50 PM NosyNed has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020