Tal's Signature

That's fine when it's a difference of opinion, but, on this occasion, it is a deliberately dishonest representation of information another poster kindly provided him with and Tal has then had the nerve to state that his sig is what the other poster said.While I agree with you about a person's right to voice their opinion, I cannot see any reason to defend a person's right to dishonestly represent another's words. I also believe that this is against the forum guidelines i.e. debate in good faith.

It's not to do with using someone's alias, he claims that the information in his sig was provided by Rahvin and pointed us at the post which he claims Rahvin said this. Unfortunately for Tal, most of us read Rahvin's post for ourselves and can see that Rahvin said nothing of the sort. Tal is fooling no-one but himself.