Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9057 total)
81 online now:
AZPaul3, jar, Tangle, Tanypteryx (4 members, 77 visitors)
Newest Member: drlove
Post Volume: Total: 889,750 Year: 862/6,534 Month: 862/682 Week: 97/445 Day: 13/30 Hour: 1/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Thread Reopen Requests 2
Member (Idle past 4067 days)
Posts: 276
From: Frodsham, Chester
Joined: 07-30-2010

Message 69 of 124 (572256)
08-05-2010 12:27 AM

Spotting fake religions
I would have thought that the point was that it is simply not possible because it relies on a subjective judgement of real and fake. There is no empirical yardstick available to measure validity in matters of faith. Indeed faith is belief without or even inspite of evidence, so it follows that no religious faith can be validated or classified as 'genuine' or 'fake', because evidence is not an accepted measure and any other measure is inevitably subjective or arbitrary or both.
Religion is inherently non-rational or irrational and to attempt to apply a rational measure of validity to such is a category error. Any non-rational measure is, by definition, not subject to validation.

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-05-2010 12:40 AM Bikerman has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022