Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 75 (8963 total)
255 online now:
DrJones*, Hyroglyphx, jar, Taq (4 members, 251 visitors)
Newest Member: Samuel567
Post Volume: Total: 870,808 Year: 2,556/23,288 Month: 747/1,809 Week: 179/225 Day: 38/44 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Trilobites, Mountains and Marine Deposits - Evidence of a flood?
kuresu
Member (Idle past 924 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 38 of 518 (482074)
09-14-2008 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by bluescat48
06-07-2008 10:08 PM


As I understand it, plate tectonics wasn't really confirmed until the early 60s. Biggest obstacle was that Wegener didn't have a good proposal for how the plates moved (another obstacle was the act of ignoring the hypothesis). He thought the continents kind of moved like icebreakers plowing through the oceanic crust. Granted, the rest of his evidence was fairly spot-on.

Anyhow, it was explained to me in elementary school, but I was born in 87.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by bluescat48, posted 06-07-2008 10:08 PM bluescat48 has not yet responded

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 924 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 181 of 518 (490144)
12-02-2008 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by Percy
12-02-2008 12:48 PM


Re: Crank support even worse than YECs
So I'm listening to the interview. And it seems that Niel is saying that long ago, when the planet formed, lighter density rocks floated to the surface.

Which, of course, is true. But this means that there would be an essentially even distribution of granitic rock across the surface of the earth. The earth certainly does not have that today, with mountainous regions having a crust at least twice as thick as that of continental crust on average (itself thicker on average than oceanic crust).

Now why would that be? How could that happen? Oh, gee, I don't know, maybe collision? Since granitic rock doesn't really subduct, it crumples and a divergent zone is produced elsewhere. This produces oceanic crust.

What's so difficult about that? Granted, I have quite the simple model, but still.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by Percy, posted 12-02-2008 12:48 PM Percy has not yet responded

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 924 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 186 of 518 (490164)
12-02-2008 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by obvious Child
12-02-2008 8:14 PM


The mid-atlantic ridge is a divergent plate boundary. No subduction occurs there.

If you want to see subduction, I recommend looking at the Juan de Fuca plate. It is currently being subducted underneath the Cascades and should eventually vanish if plate tectonics is right. Of course, we'll have to wait a very long time for it to completely vanish, but in the meantime it should be possible to measure how much it is shrinking.

And yeah, video of it happening isn't exactly possible.

[abe: adminmoose was putting up his warning as I posted this. sorry about that.]

Edited by kuresu, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by obvious Child, posted 12-02-2008 8:14 PM obvious Child has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020