|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1661 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Trilobites, Mountains and Marine Deposits - Evidence of a flood? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1661 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
Faith in Message 1085: The sorting is a secondary issue when the trilobites climb the supposed Geological Time Scale for hundreds of millions of years without changing any more than we see any creature microevolving in a few observable years in current time, same as the coelecanths, while evo theory has reptiles evolving into mammals in a time period or two. The whole thing is a big fat sham. Proving you have no idea what you are talking about.
quote: * - (adapted to table format with links on names instead of pictures)
... without changing any more than we see any creature microevolving in a few observable years in current time ... Wrong. Note: "... ten orders, over 150 families, about 5,000 genera, and over 20,000 described species. New species of trilobites are unearthed and described every year. This makes trilobites the single most diverse class of extinct organisms, and within the generalized body plan of trilobites there was a great deal of diversity of size and form. ..." Some were bottom feeders others were swimmers. Some ate vegetation, some preyed on other organisms.
... same as the coelecanths, ... And wrong again.
quote: While not as numerous and diverse as the trilobites, they still show "more we see any creature microevolving in a few observable years in current time." Ignorance is no refutation of the real world facts. Enjoy (copied from The TRVE history of the Flood... Message 1090)by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 232 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined:
|
RAZD, after all of this; YEC's are convinced that the existence of Prokaryote fossils from 3.8 billion years ago somehow refutes ToE. Not too sure why they think this.
You really are wasting your time showing reality to them. However, other people learn a lot from your posts. I've basically learned all of my biology and paleontology and genetics and and and from people of your "kind". Please keep up the good work. Edited by Pressie, : Spelling mistake. Changed "However, other people learn a lot from you posts." to "However, other people learn a lot from your posts."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1661 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
However, other people learn a lot from your posts. I've basically learned all of my biology and paleontology and genetics and and and from people of your "kind". Please keep up the good work. And what I know about geology and genetics I learned here. It is a learning environment ... for those who want to learn. Continuing with the trilobites we can look at when they became extinct:
quote: So now, adding to the problems of fossil sorting for the creationists is the Horseshoe crab (Coelacanths are not the only "living fossils" in the sea). Horseshoe crabs have been around for 450 million years, and they are the blue bloods of the ocean ... because their blood is literally blue.
quote: Now the trilobites became extinct nearly 300 million years ago, so there was a period of overlap with the Horseshoe crab of about 120 million years. So combining trilobites and horseshoe crabs we have a continuous span of marine life from the lower (early) cambrian to the present day. Each species is associated with specific time periods that are defined by both relative dating (the law of superposition) and by absolute radiometric dating. Early horse shoe crabs can be found in the same strata as late trilobites, but early trilobites are not found in the same strata as late Horseshoe crabs, and the strata they are found in are always associated with specific radioactive isotope levels that follow the pattern of the relative dating of the layers. There was no mixing of the layers. Based on the levels of radioactive isotopes extant in the layers, each layer took centuries to form. There was no sorting of the fossils. They all lived and died during the periods that the layers were growing by the gradual accretion of sediments and the detritus of marine life on the ocean floors. The fossils show it by the way they are found in the sediments along with evidence of mature marine living ecosystems, and the radioactive isotopes show it by the different levels they are measured at for the different layers. The obvious conclusion is that none of these layers were disturbed, or in any way affected, by a purported global flood. When these fossils are found on mountains, it is because of tectonic activity pushing plates together and forcing one plate over another, piling it up ... in a process that is observed to day in the continued rise of the alps and the rocky mountains. Floods don't move tectonic plates and floods don't create mountains -- they erode them. Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Floods don't move tectonic plates and floods don't create mountains -- they erode them. Of course "floods" don't do either of those things, what a silly straw man. But THE Flood built sedimentary strata which was full of dead things which became fossils, and some mountains are strata that was tectonically pushed up into mountains. And I happen to think this all occurred at the end of Noah's Flood in a great tectonic cataclysm that had something to do with causing the Flood water to recede. It also caused the separation of the continents and other interesting phenomena. Not the Flood, but geological processes connected with it. Horseshoe crabs, some of them anyway, do look quite a bit like trilobites. And I guess I'd think of them as I think of the other "living fossils" as evidence against the ToE because the changes they show are just variations within the Kind over hundreds of millions of years. Funny how the creatures that don't show such a lengthy fossil history, where there is no evidence of evolution that is, are assumed to have evolved from one thing into another, such as reptiles into mammals, whereas when there is actual evidence from one time period to another of the changes to a creature -- like trilobites, horseshoe crabs and coelecanths, the differences are obviously the expected changes within the Kind.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1661 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Of course "floods" don't do either of those things, what a silly straw man. But THE Flood built sedimentary strata which was full of dead things which became fossils, ... And this magic carpet flying flood carried whole ecosystems of living marine life complete with built-up accretion of silts and detritus of previous generations used as substrates to grow on, carried them intact with all the evidence of a continuous flow of lives one on top of the other, undisturbed ... brachiopods with their fragile stems still attached to shells of previous brachiopods ...
... and some mountains are strata that was tectonically pushed up into mountains. ... ... with those piled up intact accumulation of mature marine ecosystems that showed generations of growth on top of generations of growth ... sorted by organism/species type, sorted by radioactive isotope levels ...
... And I happen to think this all occurred at the end of Noah's Flood in a great tectonic cataclysm that had something to do with causing the Flood water to recede. ... ... that you totally made up out of thin air like all your other "explanations" and "proofs" ...
... It also caused the separation of the continents and other interesting phenomena. Not the Flood, but geological processes connected with it. ... oops, there you go making the flood move those tectonic plates, and presumably cooling them from overheating due to the massive friction fast-track movement makes ... with the animals already off the ark so they can be sorted onto the appropriate continents to sort their fossils geographically as they rapidly evolved before they got buried by the sediments ...
Horseshoe crabs, some of them anyway, do look quite a bit like trilobites. ... Gosh, they are related!
... And I guess I'd think of them as I think of the other "living fossils" as evidence against the ToE because the changes they show are just variations within the Kind over hundreds of millions of years. ... Well you're "evidence against the ToE" is a straw man because you don't understand why continual variation and adaptation actually shows evolution in an ecological environment that doesn't change that much. You only think so because that fits your beliefs, while you ignore the details of the evidence ... as always. Organisms don't need to evolve significantly if they are well suited to their ecology or are adaptable to different ecologies, but they still evolve via little changes and permutations. It's the little details that show continual evolution. The ones living today are also completely different species from the ones in the fossil record, and are only small handful of species compared to the large diversified numbers of species in the fossil record
... Funny how the creatures that don't show such a lengthy fossil history, where there is no evidence of evolution that is, ... ... if you ignore the details that do show a lengthy fossil history and plenty of evidence of evolution ...
... are assumed to have evolved from one thing into another, such as reptiles into mammals, ... Where curiously we do have fossils of transitions, including the clear transition from reptile jaw made from three bones through intermediate forms of therapsids (Probainognathus and Diarthrognathus for example) with two jaw hinges and then to a mammal jaw made of one of the reptile jaw bones while the other two are adapted to form part of the mammal ear -- the same bones the reptiles used while part of their jaw to transmit sounds to their single ear bone that makes up the third bone in the mammal ear -- and at the same time with teeth becoming differentiated into typical mammal teeth from the typical reptilian teeth. But this is not relevant to this thread about Trilobites, Mountains and Marine Deposits, so it should be discussed on another thread.
... , whereas when there is actual evidence from one time period to another of the changes to a creature -- like trilobites, horseshoe crabs and coelecanths, the differences are obviously the expected changes within the Kind. You mean within nested clades, as expected by the theory of evolution, taking into account their ecological conditions. Species after species, the ones today are not the ones from yesterday, they are descendants, evolved descendants, and they are proof that there was no flood, or at least that they were completely unaffected by the magic flying carpet flood and massive terraforming activity you use to attempt to explain the geology. Everything arranged and magically sorted to imitate old age intentionally ... the big joke of the joker god/s ... And you still cannot explain the radioactive isotope levels sorted with the fossils as if they were the remnants of long ages of decay, magically sorted by the magic carpet flying flood. Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 232 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
Faith writes: And magically ensured that the coarsest and heaviest material don't end up at the bottom. According to you gravity didn't work. Sure, Faith. Magic. Of course "floods" don't do either of those things, what a silly straw man. But THE Flood built sedimentary strata which was full of dead things which became fossils,.... Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I'm sure the coarsest ended up wherever it should end up in any given deposition.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 232 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined:
|
This one is always funny to me.
Faith writes: I'm not too sure why you think that the existence of living organisms such as Prokaryotes (also living fossils) today somehow is contrary to the TOE. Could you explain why you think it's evidence against "the ToE"?
And I guess I'd think of them as I think of the other "living fossils" as evidence against the ToE because the changes they show are just variations within the Kind over hundreds of millions of years.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Haven't mentioned prokaryotes, but gave plenty of reasoning on the trilobites and coelecanths, and more recently added the horseshoe crabs. Don't even you with your odd way of laughing at Nothing recognize that these creatures are found in a great many "time periods" up the Geological Time Scale, adding up to hundreds of millions of years, without changing to any degree that would suggest something other than a trilobite, coelacanth or horseshoe crab, while some creatures that are found in only one or two "time periods" are assumed to have evolved into something dramatically different in a time period above them?
I mean even you ought to stop and ponder how, when we have actual evidence we see no evolution whatever, just the usual changes within the Species creationists expect to see, while when there is no evidence at all, great leaps are made to assume evolution between dramatically different creatures, such as from reptiles to mammals. I know the ToE and the OE have an iron grip on your brain, but break the shackles, man, and see what's really going on here. Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 232 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
Faith. Fill up a flask with water. Add clays and gravels and plant material and whatever. Shake it all up. Put it on a shelf.
The coarsest and heaviest material always settle on the bottom first. The lighter and finest material always settle at the top. In one layer. Grading from coarsest and heaviest at the bottom to the finest and heaviest material settling at the top. The "layer" you get grades from the coarsest and heaviest at the bottom to the finest and lightest at the top... It really is easy. Anyone can do it. We did it in a physical science class when I was 10 years old. The teacher tried to explain how gravity works. Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
As I said, I'm sure whatever forms a particular deposit follows the laws of settling just fine.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 232 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
I'm still trying to figure out why you think the existence of living trilobites, coelecanths, horseshoe crabs and Prokaryotes somehow refutes "the ToE".
I still don't get your reasoning. Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I just explained it. Weird you can't follow what I said. (But there are no living trilobites)
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 232 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
I really, really don't get your reasoning. Care to try and explain again?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1661 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
... adding up to hundreds of millions of years, without changing to any degree that would suggest something other than a trilobite, coelacanth or horseshoe crab, ... Again with the typical ignorant creationist thinking. Trilobite is not a species, it is a subphylum with 10 orders and over 20,000 known species divided into different genera and families in those orders. There are no living trilobites. Coelacanth is not a species, it is an order with 7 families and many genera:
quote: And Horseshoe crab is not a species.
quote: Yessiree that image looks just exactly like the modern horseshoe crab ... hardly changed at all. Yep there are only a few "living fossils" so evolution must be false if it doesn't force species to evolve more ...
quote: All of these have a close appearing ancestor that can be found in the fossil record. They persist because they are successful at surviving and breeding, not because evolution is not happening. Of course that is only a small cross-section of the full diversity of life on earth ... and some of these have given birth to other lineages that aren't listed. ie -- how are trilobites and horseshoe crabs related if there was no evolution?
I mean even you ought to stop and ponder how, when we have actual evidence we see no evolution whatever, just the usual changes within the Calling them a species is a lie when you are talking about orders ... so I changed it to typical creationist undefined {kind} for you. And which scientists call evolution, gradual evolution from generation to generation with all offspring being members of the parent population, forming a clade when they have daughter populations ... as has occurred for trilobites, coelacanths and horseshoe crabs ...
... while when there is no evidence at all, great leaps are made to assume evolution between dramatically different creatures, such as from reptiles to mammals. And we can start another thread to deal with this falsehood or take it to Evolution of the Mammalian Jaw. It isn't relevant to this thread, unlike trilobites (and other marine growth like coelacanths and horseshoe crabs). Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : Evolution of the Mammalian Jaw Edited by RAZD, : iby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024