Thread Reopen Requests

your challenge has been accepted by MrHambre ... seehttp://EvC Forum: Macroevolution Debate: DarkStar vs MrHambrethis is in the Great Debate Forum so only you and MrHambre can post there.enjoy

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

try this linkhttp://EvC Forum: Macroevolution Debate: DarkStar vs MrHambre

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

http://EvC Forum: contracycle, clothes, humans, and bare lies.please reopen this thread so that(1) the issue of contracycles misrepresentations can be proper dealt with and(2) to keep this issue from cluttering up another thread where it is off topic.I note once more that contracycle has been challenged to substantiate three claims that he has made and that it is one of the forum guidelines that he do so when challenged.The place to do that is this thread in question.I also suggest that adminjar has become involved in this issue and someone else should handle it.

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

someone else with the same complaint.how unusual that would beif it were not true.we are not alone.

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

http://EvC Forum: Thread Reopen Requests -->EvC Forum: Thread Reopen Requestsmore evidence of similar behavior.deal with the problem, not the symptoms eh?

that works for methanks

so what's the word?contracycle is still misrepresenting and there should be a place to discuss it without interfering with other threads.closing any and every thread, or punishing any poster, that points out contracycles misrepresentations amounts to censorship.

I have yet to see contracycle suspended, and he has gotten away with far worse infractions than I was "suspended" for just for making an issue of HIS falsehoods.all I ask is that he substantiate his claimsis that really too much to ask of anyone here?

can you debate rationally with someone who keeps misrepresenting your position and then insisting that you are wrong?as noted several times now: all I ask is that he be required to substantiate his claims.last time I checked that was one of the forum guidelines that everyone was supposed to follow.if he cannot do that then he is not debating in good faith, nor complying with the forum guidelines.should I allow that? should you?

when the whole argument becomes an endless stream of answering misrepresentations, as happened on the {clothes} and is now happening on the {fundamental atheist}, there comes a point when action needs to be taken.that action is to have the person accused of misrepresentation substantiate his claims.this then interferes with the topic of the post as it becomes the dominant issue.I have asked contracycle several times to do this and all he has done is post more misrepresentations.

sadagain instead of taking action admin closes the thread, not because the thread needs to be closed but because they don't take the step of telling people to substantiate their claims and because there is no forum to do that which doesn't also get immediately closednuff said for now, but it aint over.

ignoring someone doesn't stop someone from posting lies about what you said

how about a "Got a Beef?" thread that allows people who are frustrated by the behavior of others to vent.admin can monitor it to see if a particular person keeps turning up as the miscreant and also require people to substantiate their claimsit would also allow a place for a "spat" between two posters to be carried out in a place that does not affect the other threads

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

that's three thread where the net sum of contracycle's contribution was to get the topics closed. only if people let him get away with it.

I've bookmarked this