Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9173 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,584 Year: 4,841/9,624 Month: 189/427 Week: 102/85 Day: 7/2 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Thread Reopen Requests
mark24
Member (Idle past 5274 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 14 of 305 (44366)
06-26-2003 3:01 PM


Moose.
Why did you close Buz's refutation of all radiometric dating methods? Just when it seemed we had got all the chaff out of the way, & Buz was about to realise he needed data, not opinion, you close the thread! It had remained mainly on topic, so what was the reason it was closed?
One thing that I have been having an ongoing concern about, is the possible uneveness of supplying references. The evolution side seems to be real demanding of the creation side to do such, but the evo side are perhaps lax in supplying the references also.
Regarding the cites, that radiometric dating was squiffy was Buzz' contention & quite rightly he should bear the burden of proof.
I feel cheated, I've ploughed a fair amount of time into that thread, & it was closed without a reason being given.
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Admin, posted 06-26-2003 5:38 PM mark24 has not replied
 Message 16 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-26-2003 5:50 PM mark24 has not replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5274 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 65 of 305 (69363)
11-26-2003 8:52 AM


Adminmoose,
Any chance of resurrecting this thread, please?
Thanks,
Mark

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by NosyNed, posted 11-26-2003 10:42 AM mark24 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024