Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9049 total)
513 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), Tangle (5 members, 508 visitors)
Newest Member: Wes johnson
Happy Birthday: Astrophile
Post Volume: Total: 887,604 Year: 5,250/14,102 Month: 171/677 Week: 30/26 Day: 2/10 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 12.0
Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 31 of 199 (420599)
09-08-2007 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Chiroptera
09-08-2007 4:37 PM


Re: Rob and iceage two among a crowd
I just now found out about Rob's suspension reading your post. It's ironic, because just an hour ago I came within a hair's breadth of suspending him for his conduct in the Converting raw energy into biological energy thread, see Message 307. It's seems our little Robbie has been a very busy boy.

Rob, if you're reading this, your frequent misconduct is getting really old. Your views are not a concern. You are free to espouse whatever views you like here. But could you please begin conducting yourself like an adult?


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Chiroptera, posted 09-08-2007 4:37 PM Chiroptera has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by RAZD, posted 09-09-2007 2:09 PM Admin has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 34 of 199 (420656)
09-08-2007 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by jar
09-08-2007 10:03 PM


Re: On Rob's extended suspension
You didn't mention the misconduct that resulted in the extension of Rob's suspension. The extension was not for posting off-topic but for disregarding a moderator request to stop posting in the Converting raw energy into biological energy thread (for which I took no action other than to post an admonishment), then after being suspended by a different moderator for misconduct elsewhere he requested another member to post yet another message for him. Those hearing of this for the first time I refer to Message 311.

I, too, wish Rob could comport himself in a manner which allowed him more time here during a period when creationist participation is down, but he reacts to leniency not with a sigh of relief that he wasn't suspended, but with escalation. To do nothing would be as if to have no rules.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by jar, posted 09-08-2007 10:03 PM jar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by jar, posted 09-08-2007 10:47 PM Admin has not yet responded
 Message 36 by Chiroptera, posted 09-08-2007 11:27 PM Admin has responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 40 of 199 (420714)
09-09-2007 5:24 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Chiroptera
09-08-2007 11:27 PM


Re: On Rob's extended suspension
I agree that Rob did an excellent job in the Converting raw energy into biological energy thread, until summation time.

To everyone who would like Rob back sooner rather than later, you're behaving like cats who having brought a chipmunk into the house are annoyed at their owner for taking it away. I know it's more fun when there are high-participation level creationists like Rob around, so if you want him here more often then lend him a helping hand. Post reminders to him when you see him engaging in misconduct, and don't play "let's chat and eat up all the message bandwidth" with him in threads.

Keeping Rob here isn't the moderators' responsibility, objectively and fairly enforcing the Forum Guidelines is. If members would prefer that Rob not be suspended so often then they should accept some responsibility by helping him notice when his conduct is out of bounds and by ceasing to be enablers of his misconduct.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Chiroptera, posted 09-08-2007 11:27 PM Chiroptera has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Chiroptera, posted 09-09-2007 9:17 AM Admin has not yet responded
 Message 45 by Taz, posted 09-09-2007 1:11 PM Admin has not yet responded
 Message 51 by Ken, posted 09-10-2007 11:50 AM Admin has responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 53 of 199 (421045)
09-10-2007 9:00 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Ken
09-10-2007 11:50 AM


Re: On Rob's extended suspension
Okay, I see the impression that Rob asked you to post on his behalf was incorrect. I'll reduce his suspension. Welcome aboard!


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Ken, posted 09-10-2007 11:50 AM Ken has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 128 of 199 (422680)
09-17-2007 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by jar
09-17-2007 10:37 PM


Re: AdminBuzsaw giving false advice
In terms of the Forum Guidelines, we have to apply the spirit of the Forum Guidelines and not limit ourselves to its few inadequate words. There are only ten brief rules because we wanted the Forum Guidelines to be something people would actually read.

But no quantity of words could ever accurately characterize where the line of civility is crossed in all situations, and nothing will ever cause everyone to agree on where that line is drawn. All moderators can do is use the Forum Guidelines as a guide to applying their best judgement.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by jar, posted 09-17-2007 10:37 PM jar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by jar, posted 09-17-2007 11:02 PM Admin has responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 131 of 199 (422690)
09-17-2007 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by jar
09-17-2007 11:02 PM


Re: AdminBuzsaw giving false advice
I found this wonderful Jefferson quote recently, let me see if I can dig it out again...

Ah, here it is:

Thomas Jefferson writes:

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by jar, posted 09-17-2007 11:02 PM jar has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 136 of 199 (422767)
09-18-2007 9:28 AM


Question about Offensive Content
I've said before that I don't believe EvC Forum should serve as a refuge for the easily offended, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't place any limits at all on offensive content. We almost never delete posts here, I can't even remember the last time we deleted a message, and rather than editing a post to remove any content we usually just hide the offending portion.

So Adminnemooseus has just expressed a reluctance to edit the HEWG post with the cute picture to avoid giving the impression of censorship, but AdminPD did go ahead and hide the image. Do members have any strong feelings about whether inappropriate prurient content should be hidden or not? Keep in mind that moderators do wish to avoid leaving open the possibility in people's minds that content was actually removed rather than hidden, which can become an issue when it involves members who are charging the moderator team with bias.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-18-2007 9:56 AM Admin has not yet responded
 Message 138 by Vacate, posted 09-18-2007 10:15 AM Admin has responded
 Message 145 by Jazzns, posted 09-18-2007 1:28 PM Admin has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 139 of 199 (422778)
09-18-2007 10:22 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Vacate
09-18-2007 10:15 AM


Re: Question about Offensive Content
Vacate writes:

I would prefer if EvC moderation would follow AdminPD, regardless of the attemt to leave posts un-edited if HEWG continues I will be unable to visit EvC from work.

Whoa, is that ever a strong argument! What's more, many companies, including mine, block sites with potentially offensive content, and I don't want EvC Forum to start getting blocked.

Case closed for me. Any counter-arguments?


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Vacate, posted 09-18-2007 10:15 AM Vacate has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by jar, posted 09-18-2007 10:53 AM Admin has not yet responded
 Message 142 by Chiroptera, posted 09-18-2007 12:10 PM Admin has not yet responded
 Message 146 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-18-2007 1:45 PM Admin has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 151 of 199 (422925)
09-18-2007 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by Hyroglyphx
09-18-2007 5:22 PM


Re: Question about Offensive Content
Hi Nem,

In case there's any confusion I'll repeat my position.

Because inappropriate images can be a problem for members when they visit the site while at work (or even while the significant other is in the room - "You're visiting one of *those* sites again?"), and because such content could cause the site to become blocked on company intranets (companies don't make these lists themselves, they subscribe to a service, so if a website gets on one of these lists the impact could be significant), I think moderators should always hide such images.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-18-2007 5:22 PM Hyroglyphx has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Omnivorous, posted 09-18-2007 10:11 PM Admin has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 173 of 199 (423875)
09-24-2007 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by PaulK
09-24-2007 5:24 PM


Re: The Nature of an Admin
Hi Everyone,

I'd like to just generally comment on two aspects of this discussion.

First, while the Forum Guidelines does to some extent attempt to characterize what it means to let a debate become personal, it must be understood that it just isn't possible in a few very brief sentences to capture all possible such situations that might arise.

So just to clarify a little, in my opinion whether you're calling someone a fool or calling their post foolish, neither really qualifies as civil, and without civility constructive discussion often breaks down.

But second, there's this vexing problem of how to debate with someone who appears to have difficulty putting two correct sentences together on any consistent basis. I won't provide any examples because the offenders will recognize them. Various kinds of significant faux pas are by themselves indicative of nothing, but like George Bush the 1st's continual problems with garbled syntax, some people seem to make a living at committing significant faux pas. How long does one remain polite in the face of this before it becomes condescending and artificial?

I have no answer to this second one, but I would still encourage members to maintain civility as much as they can muster. When you can't hold it in anymore, hopefully the moderators will step in.

I understand that Jar is a concern to many creationists. I rarely encounter Jar in any threads, so I probably can't be too helpful, but I hope moderators are working hard to enforce the Forum Guidelines fairly and evenly.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by PaulK, posted 09-24-2007 5:24 PM PaulK has not yet responded

Admin
Director
Posts: 12723
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 177 of 199 (423904)
09-24-2007 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by Ihategod
09-24-2007 7:03 PM


Hi Vashgun,

I'm suspending you for 4 weeks. When the suspension ends, please don't resume posting unless you've decided to try to fit in here. The next suspension will be permanent.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Ihategod, posted 09-24-2007 7:03 PM Ihategod has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by AdminNem, posted 09-24-2007 8:08 PM Admin has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021