Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9057 total)
239 online now:
AZPaul3, jar, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle, Theodoric (6 members, 233 visitors)
Newest Member: drlove
Post Volume: Total: 889,866 Year: 978/6,534 Month: 978/682 Week: 31/182 Day: 5/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate
Itinerant Lurker
Member (Idle past 1771 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 12-12-2008


Message 135 of 650 (517940)
08-03-2009 11:52 AM


Population genetics question
How are genetic markers dated? What I mean is, when genetic markers are used to track population movements throughout human history like this one,

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/lan/en/atlas.html

How are the dates associated with the various populations arrived at?


Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-03-2009 11:43 PM Itinerant Lurker has responded

  
Itinerant Lurker
Member (Idle past 1771 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 12-12-2008


Message 137 of 650 (518214)
08-04-2009 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by Dr Adequate
08-03-2009 11:43 PM


Re: Population genetics question
Thanks for the reply, do you know offhand of any specific examples of where mutation rates can be directly measured?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-03-2009 11:43 PM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-04-2009 8:32 PM Itinerant Lurker has responded

  
Itinerant Lurker
Member (Idle past 1771 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 12-12-2008


Message 139 of 650 (518322)
08-05-2009 8:24 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Dr Adequate
08-04-2009 8:32 PM


Re: Population genetics question
awesome

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-04-2009 8:32 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Itinerant Lurker
Member (Idle past 1771 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 12-12-2008


Message 140 of 650 (518812)
08-08-2009 4:02 PM


Keep on keepin on
Following the logic of the argument that Adam and Eve were created with perfect genes 6,500 years ago I'm wondering if that doesn't necessarily predict that we should be able to take a look at dna from people three thousand years ago and see a pretty huge difference between it and our dna today in that it should be "half as perfect". Anyone know of an example of this? Or does this pretty much not make sense at all.

Note: By "this" I'm referring to what this argument would predict, not the argument itself which is, of course, absolutely retarded.

Edited by Itinerant Lurker, : No reason given.

Edited by Itinerant Lurker, : No reason given.


  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022