|
Author
|
Topic: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 10.0
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
Message 2 of 305 (380701)
01-28-2007 1:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by AdminPhat
01-27-2007 1:57 AM
|
|
age dating version 2
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by AdminPhat, posted 01-27-2007 1:57 AM | | AdminPhat has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 4 of 305 (380762)
01-28-2007 6:37 PM
|
Reply to: Message 3 by Nighttrain
01-28-2007 4:55 PM
|
|
Re: age dating version 2
I've put a version of this on my website (hosted by ) that is all one html document. Click on "to share" in my signature for the index. You can copy and paste that one directly into word, and it should keep most of the hyperlinks in the process. Let me know how it works out.
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 3 by Nighttrain, posted 01-28-2007 4:55 PM | | Nighttrain has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 5 of 305 (381160)
01-30-2007 12:43 AM
|
|
|
rob
Message 294 ah, suspected as much when he dropped like a rock from spinoza.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 6 by Admin, posted 01-30-2007 9:49 AM | | RAZD has replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 7 of 305 (381351)
01-30-2007 5:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 6 by Admin
01-30-2007 9:49 AM
|
|
Re: rob
It's helpful when it appears. Don't think it was activated the first day - or it was my cookies ....
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 6 by Admin, posted 01-30-2007 9:49 AM | | Admin has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 45 of 305 (384213)
02-10-2007 2:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 42 by Fosdick
02-10-2007 1:48 PM
|
|
Re: "The Chosen Few"
Percy seems to be top dog (or cat) around here. Even Percy has been suspended.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 42 by Fosdick, posted 02-10-2007 1:48 PM | | Fosdick has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 120 of 305 (391332)
03-24-2007 3:37 PM
|
|
|
SpongeLikeBattleAxe
to whom it may concern: I forgive SpongeLikeBattleAxe for his insults on Message 6 and turn the other cheek. He is new here and so this can be expected. I've asked him to take any such concerns as he expressed here. Enjoy.
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 150 of 305 (395763)
04-17-2007 8:13 PM
|
Reply to: Message 144 by kuresu
04-16-2007 9:11 PM
|
|
Suspension over soon, but ...
Soon Rob's 24 hour suspension - his 3rd in a row on the same issue - will be up, and we will see if he can stick to a topic without going off on a Rob-tangent. I'd like to see Rob get a new topic started on his issue of morality, stated concisely with no reference to other threads, where he can lay out his position and then defend it. This gives others a chance to debate with him about it without ALSO being off topic on any other thread. I also think that if he keeps harping on this morality issue on any thread he posts on, that this is no different than randman's recapitulating rants on raised Haeckels: what is the criteria for showcase? Time will tell eh?
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 144 by kuresu, posted 04-16-2007 9:11 PM | | kuresu has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 151 by kuresu, posted 04-17-2007 8:25 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
Re: *** Re: Dr Schwartz ***
can you post it now?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 237 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-02-2007 12:42 PM | | Dr Adequate has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 239 of 305 (404891)
06-10-2007 11:57 AM
|
|
|
great debates 2 against 1?
It seems to me that if participants are agreeable that more than one per side could work, such as two creationists versus on evolutionist. The reason I ask is that it appears MurkyWaters has lost interest, his last post was 03*26*2007 09:51 PM ( Message 70) and he complained about it being or becoming "a colossal waste of time" and his last posts have been repetitive with no attempt to move forward in a positive direction. I also would like to see if there is a creationist that would like to join this great debate, either to assist MurkyWaters or replace him. Thanks.
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 240 by AdminPD, posted 06-10-2007 5:45 PM | | RAZD has replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 241 of 305 (404942)
06-10-2007 6:25 PM
|
Reply to: Message 240 by AdminPD
06-10-2007 5:45 PM
|
|
Re: great debates 2 against 1? S1WC?
I would invite Someone_Who_Cares except he only posts on great debates with anglagard as far as I can see. You'll have to let him know. This would allow us to discuss the age of the earth, as he has expressed interest in that. I would also want to discuss the matter of Lucy\Fraud as well. Not that he would increase the number of posts based on his latest rate of return.
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 240 by AdminPD, posted 06-10-2007 5:45 PM | | AdminPD has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 244 of 305 (405163)
06-11-2007 5:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 242 by Admin
06-11-2007 4:45 PM
|
|
Re: Calling a Spade a Spade
How so on the level of Clinton's lie? Has Ken Ham provided false and perjurious testimony in court? Has a judge ruled that he knowingly provided false information while under oath? Has his license to practice law been suspended anywhere? I think they are the same level if you can provide the same level of evidence that what is said is a lie. I don't think it is fair to wait for some lawsuit to make a run through court to have that level of evidence. The general public did not need that for Clinton. It does not depend on what the definition of "is" is, it depends on the demonstration of falsehood\lie: deceit, intent, false. Failure to demonstrate one would be the cut off. I'm with Jar on this one ( Message 243):
I'm sorry but regardless of whether someone believes they are lying, when they repeat something that is demonstrably false, that is what they are doing. They may well believe they are telling the truth, but they are not. They are lying. ... And his run down of the three possibilities (a variation on the "classic" Dawkins' 4 categories: stupid, ignorant, insane or malicious).
The bigger reason is that these people continue to preach falsehoods. They continue to indoctrinate kids. They work to isolate children and shield them from outside information. This needs to stop, and we have to start somewhere. There is a difference between lie and falsehood with the lie connotation, because it is not as "inflamatory" in debate - a point you have made that is also valid. I'm not sure that "lie" is less inflamatory than "cult of ignorance" so "inflamatory language" is still an issue without lie being used. I would suggest a compromise: use "falsehood" to keep a debate tone. Enjoy & thanks. Edited by RAZD, : .
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 242 by Admin, posted 06-11-2007 4:45 PM | | Admin has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 245 of 305 (405164)
06-11-2007 6:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 242 by Admin
06-11-2007 4:45 PM
|
|
Different issue, similar concerns
I have been thinking about the Dendrochronology Fact and Creationist Fraud, and I believe part of the problem with the thread is the "inflamatory language" issue, the other being the length. I note that I have received emails regarding the version of this on my website, and that it was found to be very useful in answering a creationist that was quoting Batten. It seems to me that this forum would be enriched by reviews of creationist articles like Don Battens, and I am thinking that this would work in the columnist corner, with the review worked over between the proposer (in Proposed New Topics forum) and a moderator. I am willing to rewrite the post in question with that kind of end in view if you think this is a good idea. I am not aware of any other review of this work. Enjoy.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 242 by Admin, posted 06-11-2007 4:45 PM | | Admin has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
Re: great debates 2 against 1? S1WC?
Thanks for the reply, but this is not the place for this debate. Your denial of truth and reality, your continued reluctance to engage it, and your ad hominum comments leave me little choice but to answer. My answer is Message 78 Replying in kind to your post: read it, reply (there - it's open to you) or run - your choice. But don't reply here: this is NOT a debate thread. Enjoy.
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 250 of 305 (405435)
06-12-2007 9:34 PM
|
|
|
Creation Museum Age of the Earth is False KEYS and RAZD ONLY!!!
Could you fix the title? I tried making it Creation Museum Age of the Earth is False KEYS and RAZD ONLY!!! and now to change or paste a new post I get a "We cannot post this because it appears that you are trying to hack the topic subject. Use your Back button to try again." message (a little late eh?) To be consistent with other GD topics it should be Creation Museum Age of the Earth is False (KEYS and RAZD ONLY!!!) Sorry
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 254 by RAZD, posted 06-13-2007 12:02 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1701 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 254 of 305 (405529)
06-13-2007 12:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 250 by RAZD
06-12-2007 9:34 PM
|
|
Re: Creation Museum Age of the Earth is False KEYS and RAZD ONLY!!!
fixed thanks
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 250 by RAZD, posted 06-12-2007 9:34 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2