Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,437 Year: 3,694/9,624 Month: 565/974 Week: 178/276 Day: 18/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Concerns for Percy
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 31 of 108 (119795)
06-29-2004 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Adminnemooseus
06-29-2004 1:24 AM


Re: This topic temp closed - Reopened
The content of messages 27-29 can now be found at http://EvC Forum: Professionalism or Prejudice? -->EvC Forum: Professionalism or Prejudice?
Please carry on the discussion there.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-29-2004 1:24 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 108 (120197)
06-30-2004 12:02 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by coffee_addict
06-27-2004 4:25 PM


Re: Mike gets a vote there too
quote:
Is it really fair if we put mike in though? Mike isn't exactly pure-blood creationist. He's a creationist-evolutionist hybrid.
--Sounds like Mike and I would get along well
Cheers,
-Chris

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by coffee_addict, posted 06-27-2004 4:25 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 33 of 108 (121257)
07-02-2004 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by NosyNed
06-27-2004 3:26 PM


Re: Mike gets a vote there too
quote:
But, you know, Buz has been a steady visitor. I think he might be able to step up to the challenge as well.
How can someone who doesn't follow the forum guidelines himself be trusted to enforce them?
I am particularly thinking of rules #2 and #4.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by NosyNed, posted 06-27-2004 3:26 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by NosyNed, posted 07-02-2004 5:09 PM nator has not replied
 Message 44 by Buzsaw, posted 07-02-2004 8:12 PM nator has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 34 of 108 (121268)
07-02-2004 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by nator
07-02-2004 4:11 PM


Stepping up
That's what the idea of stepping up is about. I'm trusting Buz to separate Buzsaw from AdminBuz and recognize what is needed. No one can do that perfectly but can't we have a try?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by nator, posted 07-02-2004 4:11 PM nator has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 35 of 108 (121278)
07-02-2004 5:40 PM


AdminWillow?
I think we are all missing an obvious candidate, Willowtree.
He posts here a lot.
He isnt afraid to speak his mind, regardless of whether it is a creationist or evo he is talking to.
Best thing about WT is he has the balls to admit when he is wrong or that he cannot support something.
I believe he is someone would could adopt an admin 'persona' and be fair to everyone.
Brian.

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by AdminAsgara, posted 07-02-2004 7:19 PM Brian has replied
 Message 37 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-02-2004 7:25 PM Brian has replied
 Message 39 by wj, posted 07-02-2004 7:29 PM Brian has replied
 Message 45 by jar, posted 07-02-2004 8:18 PM Brian has replied

  
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2073
From: The Universe
Joined: 10-11-2003


Message 36 of 108 (121306)
07-02-2004 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Brian
07-02-2004 5:40 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
I would support this long before I would WT's suggestion of AdminKen.

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 5:40 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 7:28 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6044 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 37 of 108 (121307)
07-02-2004 7:25 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Brian
07-02-2004 5:40 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
I think we are all missing an obvious candidate, Willowtree.
No offense, but I think you must have very different interactions with WILLOWTREE than many of us.
A recent post, though in Free for All, that I think is unacceptable:
http://EvC Forum: Internet Porn -->EvC Forum: Internet Porn
Another, that resulted in a suspension of priviledges:
http://EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD -->EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD
Given these, and other similar posts, I'll vote 'no' on WILLOWTREE...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 5:40 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 7:32 PM pink sasquatch has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 38 of 108 (121309)
07-02-2004 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by AdminAsgara
07-02-2004 7:19 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
I'd support AdminDesdamona before Adminken

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by AdminAsgara, posted 07-02-2004 7:19 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

  
wj
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 108 (121310)
07-02-2004 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Brian
07-02-2004 5:40 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
A bit of a lark inspired by a highland single malt?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 5:40 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 7:35 PM wj has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 40 of 108 (121312)
07-02-2004 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by pink sasquatch
07-02-2004 7:25 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
Yeah, but in an AdminWillow mode I think he would be completely impartial. Admins know that they need to try and be impartial and I think if Willowtree thinks he couldnt restrain himself he would not accept the job.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-02-2004 7:25 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-02-2004 7:39 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 41 of 108 (121313)
07-02-2004 7:35 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by wj
07-02-2004 7:29 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
and 18 year old at that

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by wj, posted 07-02-2004 7:29 PM wj has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by wj, posted 07-02-2004 7:46 PM Brian has not replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6044 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 42 of 108 (121315)
07-02-2004 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Brian
07-02-2004 7:32 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
It might be an interesting experiment, but reading over that last 50 or so messages of the PROOF OF GOD thread reveals that WILLOWTREE has recently broken the majority of the forum rules...
I don't think someone that disregards the rules should be picked to enforce them.
And I don't think someone that just got suspended should be picked to suspend others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 7:32 PM Brian has not replied

  
wj
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 108 (121319)
07-02-2004 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Brian
07-02-2004 7:35 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
It must have been the good stuff to produce that effect. I hope it wears off quickly and you will revert to the erudice, logical, sensible person that previously posted under that pseudonym. Otherwise the board will be covered in chicken shit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 7:35 PM Brian has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 108 (121325)
07-02-2004 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by nator
07-02-2004 4:11 PM


Re: Mike gets a vote there too
How can someone who doesn't follow the forum guidelines himself be trusted to enforce them. I am particularly thinking of rules #2 and #4.
Schraf, the problem is that when Buz kicks your ideological butt, you and some others sometimes resort to pure substanceless yada, much of which simply isn't worth my precious time for responses. You then go whining about forum rules. I appreciate the fact that a couple or so would support me for the job, but I'm afraid I would be quite useless as a moderator, because I usually only have time to read the few threads which I post in, so Schraf, I imagine that makes you quite relieved.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by nator, posted 07-02-2004 4:11 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by nator, posted 07-03-2004 5:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 45 of 108 (121330)
07-02-2004 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Brian
07-02-2004 5:40 PM


Re: AdminWillow?
I'm sorry but is this the post of an admin?
Holmes has no argument or case, whatever he or she is - they are whitewashing black to be something other. Holmes is probably a pedophile but he or she probably would never admit it.
This entire question answers itself IF honesty and integrity exist.
Does porn adversely affect kids ?
Merely asking the question reveals an answer of nonsense to follow.
It is not a matter of opinion - porn is evil to kids. Only completely amoral perverts without any character argue these things, while hiding behind First Amendment rights which is not the issue.
If ten thousand persons with Ph.D.'s say porn does not harm kids this means they are secret pedophiles and brazen liars. I wish I knew what this Holmes creep looked like - I bet he is a life long customer of prostitutes.
From Message 249?
I'm sorry but WILLOWTREE runs around making personal comments about others, calling them liars, using obscenities and even castigating the other Christians on this board.
There is no place in polite society for someone like that.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 5:40 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Brian, posted 07-02-2004 8:29 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024