|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3069 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Concerns for Percy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
The content of messages 27-29 can now be found at http://EvC Forum: Professionalism or Prejudice? -->EvC Forum: Professionalism or Prejudice?
Please carry on the discussion there. Adminnemooseus
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
TrueCreation Inactive Member |
quote:--Sounds like Mike and I would get along well Cheers,-Chris
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2191 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: How can someone who doesn't follow the forum guidelines himself be trusted to enforce them? I am particularly thinking of rules #2 and #4.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9003 From: Canada Joined: |
That's what the idea of stepping up is about. I'm trusting Buz to separate Buzsaw from AdminBuz and recognize what is needed. No one can do that perfectly but can't we have a try?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4981 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
I think we are all missing an obvious candidate, Willowtree.
He posts here a lot.He isnt afraid to speak his mind, regardless of whether it is a creationist or evo he is talking to. Best thing about WT is he has the balls to admit when he is wrong or that he cannot support something. I believe he is someone would could adopt an admin 'persona' and be fair to everyone. Brian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminAsgara Administrator (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2073 From: The Universe Joined: |
I would support this long before I would WT's suggestion of AdminKen.
AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
pink sasquatch Member (Idle past 6044 days) Posts: 1567 Joined: |
I think we are all missing an obvious candidate, Willowtree. No offense, but I think you must have very different interactions with WILLOWTREE than many of us. A recent post, though in Free for All, that I think is unacceptable:http://EvC Forum: Internet Porn -->EvC Forum: Internet Porn Another, that resulted in a suspension of priviledges:http://EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD -->EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD Given these, and other similar posts, I'll vote 'no' on WILLOWTREE...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4981 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
I'd support AdminDesdamona before Adminken
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
wj Inactive Member |
A bit of a lark inspired by a highland single malt?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4981 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
Yeah, but in an AdminWillow mode I think he would be completely impartial. Admins know that they need to try and be impartial and I think if Willowtree thinks he couldnt restrain himself he would not accept the job.
Brian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4981 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
and 18 year old at that
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
pink sasquatch Member (Idle past 6044 days) Posts: 1567 Joined: |
It might be an interesting experiment, but reading over that last 50 or so messages of the PROOF OF GOD thread reveals that WILLOWTREE has recently broken the majority of the forum rules...
I don't think someone that disregards the rules should be picked to enforce them. And I don't think someone that just got suspended should be picked to suspend others.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
wj Inactive Member |
It must have been the good stuff to produce that effect. I hope it wears off quickly and you will revert to the erudice, logical, sensible person that previously posted under that pseudonym. Otherwise the board will be covered in chicken shit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
How can someone who doesn't follow the forum guidelines himself be trusted to enforce them. I am particularly thinking of rules #2 and #4. Schraf, the problem is that when Buz kicks your ideological butt, you and some others sometimes resort to pure substanceless yada, much of which simply isn't worth my precious time for responses. You then go whining about forum rules. I appreciate the fact that a couple or so would support me for the job, but I'm afraid I would be quite useless as a moderator, because I usually only have time to read the few threads which I post in, so Schraf, I imagine that makes you quite relieved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I'm sorry but is this the post of an admin?
Holmes has no argument or case, whatever he or she is - they are whitewashing black to be something other. Holmes is probably a pedophile but he or she probably would never admit it. This entire question answers itself IF honesty and integrity exist. Does porn adversely affect kids ? Merely asking the question reveals an answer of nonsense to follow. It is not a matter of opinion - porn is evil to kids. Only completely amoral perverts without any character argue these things, while hiding behind First Amendment rights which is not the issue. If ten thousand persons with Ph.D.'s say porn does not harm kids this means they are secret pedophiles and brazen liars. I wish I knew what this Holmes creep looked like - I bet he is a life long customer of prostitutes. From Message 249? I'm sorry but WILLOWTREE runs around making personal comments about others, calling them liars, using obscenities and even castigating the other Christians on this board. There is no place in polite society for someone like that. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024