Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 14.0
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3727 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 48 of 134 (447165)
01-08-2008 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by AdminBuzsaw
01-07-2008 5:19 PM


Re: admin buz
You said
It has been determined in past discussion that member admins have a natural tendency to favor their own ideological kind. Get it?
I'm intrigued as to where I can find this discussion. AFAICR, creationist moderators were recruited so that the usual creationist claim of biased moderation by evo mods (and it was hoped that the creationist moderators would moderate creationists) would be seen to be groundless.
The last creationist mod who used his mod status to defend fellow creationists on ideological grounds alone was randman and I know of no other mod that was "sacked" for behaving in this way because none of them do.
So, will you please provide a link so that I can go and read the discussion you referred to since I cerainly didn't see it first time round.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 01-07-2008 5:19 PM AdminBuzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 01-08-2008 6:34 PM Trixie has replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3727 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 54 of 134 (447387)
01-09-2008 4:30 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by AdminBuzsaw
01-08-2008 6:34 PM


Re: admin buz
Priceless, absolutely priceless! You couldn't make this up! Here we have a thread entitled "General Discussion of Moderation Procedures 14.0" and you state
AdminPD, in the OP of this thread, has made it clear that this thread is not a discussion thread so other than what I've said I won't be engaging in any debate or further discussion on this.
If you read her OP a little more carefully you'll see that what she in fact says is
This thread is provided for the general membership to present and discuss comments or concerns dealing with moderator procedures/actions or the need for moderator action.
(bolding and italicisation mine)
Are you seriously suggesting that this thread isn't a discussion thread? It's fine that you don't want to engage in debate on this thread, but that's not what I was doing. I was trying to discuss moderation and was interested in reading the discussion you mentioned so that I could be more informed as to what was said. You obviously remember the discussion so should be able to find it. I have absolutely no recollection of it so have no idea where to begin searching. Can you give me a hint?
Thanks

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 01-08-2008 6:34 PM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024