Global Flood Evidence: A Place For Faith to Present Some

such a very elegant debate technique.you are demonstrating very clearly that your only purpose here is one (at best) of hopeful conversion and (at worst) of some twisted prideful showing-off of however superior you find yourself to be. you have no interest in debate. you have no interest in knowledge or understanding. you only have an interest in telling us how smart you are and how much you know and how amazingly foolish all of us wh understand that 33 feet of water doubles the pressure of the ENTIRE atmosphere or that "recently" uplifted mountains hold fossils, particularly of marine life, but that volcanic ones do not thus demonstrating that it's a function of being uplifted and not of a global flood.you have a petty and disruptive way of discussing information and whenever you don't like something someone else says, you simply call them deceived or liars or idiots. i'm calling you on this in hopes that you will amend your ways. i don't care if you change your mind, but your method of participation is completely detrimental.

the problem isn't that faith hasn't said enough, rather that what she has said are exemplary statements, not evidentiary ones. she keeps saying "the flood explains _____ better than modern geology does" but never saying how. how is the necessary evidence, not the what. we know what exists in geological formations; we want to know why.