Hi again Faith.
quote:
This is what is wrong with this whole argument. "What we expect" is pretty much meaningless (in relation either to a worldwide Flood or to evolution, since both are unobserved and unobservable and we have no way of knowing what conditions existed in the distant past}, but it's the level on which the whole argument is conducted. I have no idea how we get different layers with different types of sediments from the Flood, but there are creationist theories that try to explain it and they are intelligent theories.
You are saying that different layers with different sediments are "Terrific evidence" for the flood, correct? Then shouldn't "Terrific evidence" show us what we should expect to find? Terrific evidence for a flood SHOULD be one big layer, shouldn't it? We don't have that. We have many different layers. So I don't see how different layers of sediment is evidence for the flood?
May we see some of these Creationist theories? If they exist?
quote:
In contrast with all the speculative musings about how this or that might have formed, the abundance of fossils throughout the earth remains TERRIFIC evidence for a worldwide Flood.
You may have answered this already, but why does the abundance of fossils throughout the earth support a worldwide Flood rather than animals living (and dying) globally?
Thank you for your time