Nope, Mod, it is not the only difference. The problem for the flood model is that they are the wrong type of fossils and distributed in the wrong way. You have to exam the details.
Because of these differences the fossils are evidence against the global, recent flood.
If you are refering to Message 74 that is NOT what purpledawn saw at ALL!
What PD saw was that mark had only made assertions without supplying the logic behind them. That is NOT the same as agreeing with an alternate eplanation. PD didn't come down on either side of the question yet. PD is waiting for the two side to explain the reasoning behind their assertions. For the most part, neither side has done that yet.