Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
106 online now:
PaulK, Phat (2 members, 104 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,046 Year: 5,158/6,534 Month: 1/577 Week: 69/135 Day: 0/1 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Geologic Column
edge
Member (Idle past 980 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 3 of 55 (50728)
08-16-2003 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Minnemooseus
08-16-2003 3:35 PM


Well...
...perhaps a quick treatment...

quote:
Perhaps Edge would be up to the task of re-outlining the difference between the textbook version of the geologic column,...

Actually, I have a text in front of me that shows 15 different geological columns for the Cambrian alone... I think what you mean here is the 'geological column as most YECs see it'. This is actually the Geological Time Scale as your first site points out quite well. There is basically one time scale. How it got filled with rocks is a different story. Every location on earth has its own geological column.

quote:
... and the real world version of the geologic column.

Yes, this (these) are the real story. They represent the actual rocks occurring at a given location, in order of occurrence. They essentially fill in the time scale 'trays' with rocks. In most cases, not all periods of the time scale are represented. This is not unexpected or a violation of some geological precept.

In fact, we expect gaps, some of them quite large. This is because of erosion or non-deposition of rocks in those gaps which we generalize as 'unconformities'. We know unconformities are real, because we live on one. There have been no significant sedimentary rocks deposited on the Canadian shield (for instance) for as long as anyone can remember.

quote:
I know we've had some discussion of this in the past. In short, the textbook version is a timeline, which really says nothing about rocks. This is why there is a lot of truth to the statement "The geologic column only exists in textbooks".

IF one equates the geological column with geological time scale, yes. However, that is only done by YECs as far as I know.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-16-2003 3:35 PM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 02-13-2004 1:44 PM edge has taken no action
 Message 50 by Minnemooseus, posted 05-11-2018 1:11 AM edge has taken no action
 Message 51 by Faith, posted 05-20-2018 12:40 PM edge has taken no action

  
edge
Member (Idle past 980 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


(1)
Message 46 of 55 (832798)
05-10-2018 9:46 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Adminnemooseus
04-24-2018 9:17 PM


Re: BUMP
Not sure if this is appropriate. but I had to respond to Faith's summation post on the "We have the fossils ..." thread.

Basically, she says that she wishes only to discuss real strata that are extensive and 'flat-lying', and are the basis for the geological column. She produces two images from disparate locations not in the Grand Canyon which are examples of such strata.

Well, I wonder if she will explain the sand channel that is highly visible in the Buffalo Sandstone in the first image. It clearly pinches out almost completely to the right side of the roadcut.

In the second image, I'd like to know the formation involved because it looks like a lacustrine deposit; and lakes are usually limited in extent and form in, ... well ... low places in the topography, er ... landscape.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Adminnemooseus, posted 04-24-2018 9:17 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by jar, posted 05-10-2018 10:02 PM edge has replied
 Message 49 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-10-2018 11:57 PM edge has taken no action

  
edge
Member (Idle past 980 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 48 of 55 (832802)
05-10-2018 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by jar
05-10-2018 10:02 PM


Re: BUMP
Since she has decided to not understand what a geological column is or what reality is or what geology actually shows all she can do is regurgitate the dogma of her Cult.

Can one person be a cult?

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by jar, posted 05-10-2018 10:02 PM jar has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022