Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Post your short questions here. No need to start a thread everytime.
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4926 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 59 of 198 (265966)
12-06-2005 2:00 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by pink sasquatch
12-06-2005 1:38 AM


Re: Nuggin and Randman Great Debate
I alluded to those threads, and you are welcome to e-mail nuggins if you want.
How about something that never seemed to get resolved awhile back, the historical and present use of evolutionist claims of embryonic evidence for ToE.
Imo, the issue was not resolved because of confusion among the many evos of what had been posted and not posted. Admittedly, it could be better for the evo-side to debate something else, as I really think there is no argument or valid excuse for such forgeries and false claims being used so prominently.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by pink sasquatch, posted 12-06-2005 1:38 AM pink sasquatch has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4926 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 142 of 198 (322997)
06-18-2006 7:03 PM


why is/was my thread deleted?
The thread "the underlying assumptions rig the debate" is no longer there.
Is this a form of censorship? Someone here doesn't like the fact a persuasive argument has been made on my end and so gets into the system and deletes it?
Edited by randman, : No reason given.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by CK, posted 06-18-2006 7:35 PM randman has not replied
 Message 144 by arachnophilia, posted 06-18-2006 8:05 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024