That facts you mentioned are not irrelevant to the debate. They are very pertinent. Also pertinent are other facts like how the ID movement were encouraging and eagerly awaiting to put ID into court. It is not a rules violation to state what you just stated, though some elements of its wording are debateable.
However, that is not important.
My point was exactly that - as long as you actually did stay within guidelines then the bystanders will see that and conclude that the evos here are twisting and turning to come up with reasons to silence you. Your point gets proven, and you can go to or start a fairer forum where you can discuss this victory without fear of suspension.
Its a win-win situation...as long as you avoid blemishing it with off topic posts, ignoring moderator direction, insulting other members and other obvious and visible rule violations. I wish you the best of luck with this tactic - I'll be keen to defend you when they try and suspend you when you have been within the forum rules.