quote:
Originally posted by LudvanB:
JP,you know as well as i do that they just plucked those numbers right out of thin air. There's no evidence that there even was an ark(Ron Wyatts boat shaped mud print in hungary was debunked by ACTUAL SCIENTISTS almost a decade ago),so lets not waste time in discussing how much food they brought into a non-existant ark. The hebrew story of Noah's ark is an ancient sumerian legend recycled out of the epic of gilgamesh. There has floods in many areas of the world,thats not in question. There is also much evidence of a mesopotamian flood a few thousands of years back,which may well be at the root of the gilgamesh flood legend,which wa sinturn recycled by the babylonians,then by the hebrew and finaly by the christians YECS who today are writing book of feasibility about mythological boats...
This is not fair logic. First, evolutionists put forth evidence that is supposed to show that a global flood within the relatively recent past could not have occured. John Paul and TrueCreation are attempting to show that these evidences are not valid. It is not fair that you can provide evidence against a flood, but JP and TC can't provide reasons to believe that the flood was reasonable. Whether or not they do a good job in convincing you that a flood is reasonable is your decision, however, they have every right to try to show that a global flood was feasible.
™ Version 4.2