Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

animals on the ark

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   animals on the ark
mark24
Member (Idle past 5221 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 30 of 196 (6390)
03-09-2002 9:30 AM 		Reply to: Message 29 by John Paul
03-09-2002 9:13 AM

quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:

Are any of your numbers for feeding horses anywhere in literature? The book I mention is fully referenced, that is why I ask. Did you take into consideration that the horses could have been ponies?
​
​
Or Hyracotherium? But aren't there horse fossils allegedly laid down in the flood? So, they would be MODERN horses, not ponies. This then begs the question that Hyracotherium & friends would have to be kept AS WELL, since mammals were on board.
​
Mark
​
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by John Paul, posted 03-09-2002 9:13 AM John Paul has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by John Paul, posted 03-09-2002 9:59 AM mark24 has replied
  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5221 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 196 (6397)
03-09-2002 10:53 AM 		Reply to: Message 31 by John Paul
03-09-2002 9:59 AM

But didn't God instruct Noah to take on board ALL mammals? (Not his words, I know).
​
Mark
​
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by John Paul, posted 03-09-2002 9:59 AM John Paul has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024