|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 13.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
talk to Taz. He seems to be able to hide posts (and I mean the whole damn thing, not just the text).
Or do the simple thing. Delete all the text through an edit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
Technically, her account is labelled "Inactive".
This means Faith can easily reactivate her account without the aid of admins. This assumes, of course, that's there's only one type of "inactive" status.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
I don't see the red icon by her name on her posts.
If one could show me the list of currently suspended people that would be great. The evidence for her only being inactive:http://EvC Forum: Faith Topic Index -->EvC Forum: Faith Topic Index http://EvC Forum: Information -->EvC Forum: Information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
Is it an insult to be honestly questioned?
I guess so, according to you. Or is that you just don't like being honestly questioned? You know, because it might just expose the flaws in your thinking? I'm betting that's it. Oh, and just because I read Hamlet every day doesn't mean I actually understand Hamlet. You're asking for special protection from something that is hardly insulting. This is a debate for crying out loud--you're supposed to find the weakness in your opponents argument and then proceed to tear it apart. Now if jar had called you a lying hypocrite who murders young children to bath in their blood you would have a point. As it is, he (as far as I can really recall) does not insult you. Unless, of course, you find the truth insulting.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
I disagree with his decision labelling pointmanzero's topic as not a topic. This board has promoted similar arguments in the past, both for creo and evo positions.
If anything, refer him to those.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
I really don't think an admin who participated to a fair degree should close that thread (in general).
I especially disagree with the admin who participated to a fair degree closing the thread after making the last post. (in general) And I very strongly disagree with admin actions being made under the normal account profile. (in general) NJ has performed all three actions in ray's thread. NJ, open up the thread and let someone else close it, and please make admin actions in your admin name.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
so, is any one going to comment on this case of admin abuse?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
I don't want to continue the farce of a thread, but don't you find it fishy that the admin who makes the last comment also closes the thread and does not make the closing message in his admin account?
To be clear, I find what NJ did to be a misappropriate use of his admin powers. Do you not find this wrong? It's akin to buz debating in his admin account, except on a worse scale.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
do I have to spell it out in painfully clear terms?
You participated in the thread. You made the last post, and promptly closed it. You also, last I checked (several hours back), had no message with your admin account closing the thread. I am well aware of the 300 limit (to all). My problem is not that the thread was closed at the 300 limit. My problem is that it was closed by a participant immediately after that participant made the final post. Do I have a problem with you making the final post in the thread? No. It is by closing it yourself when you've made the final post. It's incredibly similar to "This is why and that's that, now shut up, no more debate". Am I really the only person who sees this as a problem?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
thank you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
you'll have to ask him. It seems he suspended himself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
kuresu Member (Idle past 2514 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
thank you for agreeing with him. That would mean he is now wrong (or would he still be right since I disagree?).
CFO, your "logic" is truly a wonder to behold.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024