Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 13.0
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 3 of 312 (424680)
09-28-2007 4:04 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Rrhain
09-28-2007 3:44 AM


Re: Pay attention to the forum, Rrhain...
talk to Taz. He seems to be able to hide posts (and I mean the whole damn thing, not just the text).
Or do the simple thing. Delete all the text through an edit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Rrhain, posted 09-28-2007 3:44 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Rrhain, posted 09-28-2007 4:58 AM kuresu has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 61 of 312 (425287)
10-01-2007 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by AdminNem
10-01-2007 5:12 PM


Re: EvC becomes more of a joke
Technically, her account is labelled "Inactive".
This means Faith can easily reactivate her account without the aid of admins.
This assumes, of course, that's there's only one type of "inactive" status.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by AdminNem, posted 10-01-2007 5:12 PM AdminNem has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by AdminPaul, posted 10-01-2007 5:22 PM kuresu has replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 63 of 312 (425291)
10-01-2007 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by AdminPaul
10-01-2007 5:22 PM


Re: Faith's Membership Status
I don't see the red icon by her name on her posts.
If one could show me the list of currently suspended people that would be great.
The evidence for her only being inactive:
http://EvC Forum: Faith Topic Index -->EvC Forum: Faith Topic Index
http://EvC Forum: Information -->EvC Forum: Information

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by AdminPaul, posted 10-01-2007 5:22 PM AdminPaul has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by AdminPaul, posted 10-01-2007 5:45 PM kuresu has not replied
 Message 66 by Chiroptera, posted 10-01-2007 5:55 PM kuresu has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 163 of 312 (432433)
11-06-2007 1:33 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by Buzsaw
11-05-2007 8:45 PM


Re: The 24/7 In Your Face One
Is it an insult to be honestly questioned?
I guess so, according to you.
Or is that you just don't like being honestly questioned? You know, because it might just expose the flaws in your thinking? I'm betting that's it.
Oh, and just because I read Hamlet every day doesn't mean I actually understand Hamlet.
You're asking for special protection from something that is hardly insulting. This is a debate for crying out loud--you're supposed to find the weakness in your opponents argument and then proceed to tear it apart. Now if jar had called you a lying hypocrite who murders young children to bath in their blood you would have a point. As it is, he (as far as I can really recall) does not insult you. Unless, of course, you find the truth insulting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2007 8:45 PM Buzsaw has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 167 of 312 (432701)
11-07-2007 8:24 PM


Admin Nem's Decision
I disagree with his decision labelling pointmanzero's topic as not a topic. This board has promoted similar arguments in the past, both for creo and evo positions.
If anything, refer him to those.

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by AdminNem, posted 11-07-2007 10:31 PM kuresu has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 203 of 312 (437674)
12-01-2007 12:10 AM


Nem closes Positive Evidence for Atheism thread
I really don't think an admin who participated to a fair degree should close that thread (in general).
I especially disagree with the admin who participated to a fair degree closing the thread after making the last post. (in general)
And I very strongly disagree with admin actions being made under the normal account profile. (in general)
NJ has performed all three actions in ray's thread.
NJ, open up the thread and let someone else close it, and please make admin actions in your admin name.

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by kuresu, posted 12-01-2007 3:36 PM kuresu has not replied
 Message 220 by Chiroptera, posted 12-01-2007 9:56 PM kuresu has not replied
 Message 247 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 12-02-2007 6:13 PM kuresu has not replied
 Message 250 by AdminPD, posted 12-02-2007 7:33 PM kuresu has replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 213 of 312 (437827)
12-01-2007 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by kuresu
12-01-2007 12:10 AM


Re: Nem closes Positive Evidence for Atheism thread
so, is any one going to comment on this case of admin abuse?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by kuresu, posted 12-01-2007 12:10 AM kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by jar, posted 12-01-2007 3:59 PM kuresu has replied
 Message 217 by ringo, posted 12-01-2007 4:09 PM kuresu has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 216 of 312 (437837)
12-01-2007 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by jar
12-01-2007 3:59 PM


Re: Nem closes Positive Evidence for Atheism thread
I don't want to continue the farce of a thread, but don't you find it fishy that the admin who makes the last comment also closes the thread and does not make the closing message in his admin account?
To be clear, I find what NJ did to be a misappropriate use of his admin powers. Do you not find this wrong? It's akin to buz debating in his admin account, except on a worse scale.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by jar, posted 12-01-2007 3:59 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 12-01-2007 4:12 PM kuresu has not replied
 Message 219 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-01-2007 7:52 PM kuresu has replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 221 of 312 (437947)
12-02-2007 3:48 AM
Reply to: Message 219 by Hyroglyphx
12-01-2007 7:52 PM


Re: Nem closes Positive Evidence for Atheism thread
do I have to spell it out in painfully clear terms?
You participated in the thread. You made the last post, and promptly closed it. You also, last I checked (several hours back), had no message with your admin account closing the thread.
I am well aware of the 300 limit (to all). My problem is not that the thread was closed at the 300 limit. My problem is that it was closed by a participant immediately after that participant made the final post.
Do I have a problem with you making the final post in the thread? No. It is by closing it yourself when you've made the final post.
It's incredibly similar to "This is why and that's that, now shut up, no more debate".
Am I really the only person who sees this as a problem?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-01-2007 7:52 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-02-2007 1:59 PM kuresu has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 251 of 312 (438109)
12-02-2007 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 250 by AdminPD
12-02-2007 7:33 PM


Re: Nem closes Positive Evidence for Atheism thread
thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by AdminPD, posted 12-02-2007 7:33 PM AdminPD has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 259 of 312 (438504)
12-05-2007 12:03 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by Cold Foreign Object
12-04-2007 11:02 PM


Re: Why is NJ suspended?
you'll have to ask him. It seems he suspended himself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 12-04-2007 11:02 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2514 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 262 of 312 (438594)
12-05-2007 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 261 by Taz
12-05-2007 11:16 AM


Re: Why is NJ suspended?
thank you for agreeing with him. That would mean he is now wrong (or would he still be right since I disagree?).
CFO, your "logic" is truly a wonder to behold.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by Taz, posted 12-05-2007 11:16 AM Taz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024