How can "Creationism" be supported?

I think Ray has answered the question. As he demonstrates, creationism can be supported by windy meaningless pseudophilosophical babbling, childish logical fallacies, making up lies about your opponents' position, gabbling nonsense, hiding from the evidence, ignoring science, and declaring creationism to be right over and over again as though saying it would eventually make it true.Of course, when I say supported, y'know, I don't mean justified. But this really is the best they can do.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Of course.The fact that creationism is wrong doesn't in itself imply that evolution is correct.The evidence does.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This is, of course, rubbish. "Straightforward logic" says that there is in fact a difference between two different things. Because of course it does not. For example, the fact that a bicycle is designed does not imply that it has an invisible designer. The designer of a bicycle is, invariably, visible. Also, he exists. Yes, we agree that you've been fooled.Do go on.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.