Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   explaining common ancestry
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2492 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 151 of 159 (273333)
12-27-2005 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by Parasomnium
12-27-2005 5:15 PM


Re: Question for Carico
Ooh ohh, let me try...
dog, horse, cow, human, pig, cat, gorilla
horse, human, gorilla - more than 3 letters
dog, cow, pig, cat - 3 letters
How DARE YOU suggest that all things with more than 3 letters can interbreed! That's just sick!
Apples can not interbreed with Pianos! Celery can not interbreed with Wyoming!
More lies upon lies from you Theory of Alphabet supporters!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Parasomnium, posted 12-27-2005 5:15 PM Parasomnium has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Carico, posted 12-29-2005 9:36 AM Nuggin has replied

  
Carico
Inactive Member


Message 152 of 159 (273786)
12-29-2005 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by Nuggin
12-27-2005 7:37 PM


Re: Question for Carico
Sorry, but you're attempt at twisting this around to say that I'm suggesting it is another lie. It is YOU who said that humans breed with apes. Those are your words, not mine. I'm the one who has said all along it is impossible which makes the theory of evolution impossible. So you either cannot understand the English language or you are slandering me again. And since you have no conscience about slandering people, then again, you are not interested in what's true or false but simply maligning people. Therefore, conversation with someone like you serves no useful purpose.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Nuggin, posted 12-27-2005 7:37 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Yaro, posted 12-29-2005 10:04 AM Carico has not replied
 Message 154 by Nuggin, posted 12-29-2005 10:09 AM Carico has not replied
 Message 155 by mark24, posted 12-29-2005 12:05 PM Carico has not replied
 Message 156 by AdminJar, posted 12-29-2005 12:22 PM Carico has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6496 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 153 of 159 (273796)
12-29-2005 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Carico
12-29-2005 9:36 AM


Re: Question for Carico
Cairco. It is you who apparently don't understand the language..

HUMANS ARE CLASSIFIED AS APES. WHEN PEOPLE HAVE SEX, THEY ARE HAVING SEX WITH APES OF THE SAME SPECIES. I.E. PEOPLE CAN (AND DO) BREED WITH APES.

Do you understand what I just posted? In case you missed it, it's above this paragraph in big type. Please repond with "I understand" or "I don't understand", that way we can actually continue the discussion.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-29-2005 10:04 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Carico, posted 12-29-2005 9:36 AM Carico has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2492 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 154 of 159 (273799)
12-29-2005 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Carico
12-29-2005 9:36 AM


Carico can't define "ape"
It is YOU who said that humans breed with apes.
I have given you the scientific definition of "ape". You can't understand it/won't accept it.
I have given you the encyclopedic definition of "ape". You can't understand it/won't accept it.
I have asked you to define "ape". You have refused, implying that you simple don't understand the word at all.
If you yourself can not answer simple questions about a 3 LETTER word that you insist on using, how do you expect any of us to take you seriously.
I'm honestly starting to think that Carico is an Admin prank. A test to see how far they can go before people start flaming

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Carico, posted 12-29-2005 9:36 AM Carico has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 155 of 159 (273825)
12-29-2005 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Carico
12-29-2005 9:36 AM


Re: Question for Carico
Carico,
Sorry, but you're attempt at twisting this around to say that I'm suggesting it is another lie. It is YOU who said that humans breed with apes.
You have accused me of lying, you have accused Nuggin of lying. Yes we did say humans breed with apes. Humans are apes, they breed with other humans, ergo they breed with apes. Humans don't breed with other species of ape, yet they still breed with apes. What don't you understand?
There are two possibilities, you are just pug stupid, or you are ignorant. Given that this has been pointed out to you many, many times, the ignorant option has to be checked off.
Now, you have accused me of lying, so I would like you to show where I deliberately wrote a falsehood, or apologise. Are all christians this nasty? You couldn't be further from convincing people that christianity is the right way to live your life. You refuse to read what people write, then accuse them of lying. Repeatedly.
If this is the level of manners & intellectual honesty I can expect from your church, then: christianity, no thanks!
Ever heard of leading by example?
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Carico, posted 12-29-2005 9:36 AM Carico has not replied

  
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 156 of 159 (273828)
12-29-2005 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Carico
12-29-2005 9:36 AM


Warning and restriction of permissions
Comments such as
Sorry, but you're attempt at twisting this around to say that I'm suggesting it is another lie.
are simply not allowed at EvC. Do not accuse another member of lying. If you believe that might be the case you can respond in one of the Administrative threads. However, you better be able to back up any such assertion.
So far you have shown a complete inability to even read what has been posted. That does not bode well for your future at EvC. Since you seem icapable of following guidelines of discussing messages rationally, you are going to be resricted to positing in the thread devoted to you in the Great Debate forum.
There you will be sheltered and allowed to discuss the subject with only one opponent. Once you demonstrate the ability to discuss a subject your permissions will be restored.
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 12-29-2005 11:27 AM

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • Message 1

  • Thread Reopen Requests

  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum

  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
  • See also Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 152 by Carico, posted 12-29-2005 9:36 AM Carico has not replied

      
    Steen
    Inactive Member


    Message 157 of 159 (275084)
    01-02-2006 5:23 PM


    Well, I was going to respond to carico, as he is on another board where he claimed to have proven everybody here wrong, but it seems that this fabrication has been amply clarified.

    Replies to this message:
     Message 158 by Coragyps, posted 01-02-2006 5:33 PM Steen has not replied

      
    Coragyps
    Member (Idle past 734 days)
    Posts: 5553
    From: Snyder, Texas, USA
    Joined: 11-12-2002


    Message 158 of 159 (275086)
    01-02-2006 5:33 PM
    Reply to: Message 157 by Steen
    01-02-2006 5:23 PM


    Well, I was going to respond to carico, as he is on another board
    She. But she's learning nothing over there, either.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 157 by Steen, posted 01-02-2006 5:23 PM Steen has not replied

      
    Adminnemooseus
    Administrator
    Posts: 3974
    Joined: 09-26-2002


    Message 159 of 159 (275570)
    01-04-2006 12:18 AM


    Stop it
    Carico has complained here.
    Carico is restricted out of this topic.
    I think his complaint is fully valid.
    Regardless of the validity or lack of validity of Carico's position in this debate, the previous two messages were very much uncalled for.
    Actually, this would be true, even if he was not restricted out.
    Period.
    Adminnemooseus
    Added by edit: I don't care if I may have gotten the gender wrong.
    This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 01-04-2006 12:20 AM

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024