Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lucy and Secular Humanism
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 64 (178446)
01-19-2005 2:30 AM


This is a spin-off of thread "The Inerrancy of the Bible". At message 199 I posted:
Tom writes:
quote:
Instead of wasting millions of federal tax dollars to make displays like shows lucy(a chimp like creature)having human hands, feet in museums to support secular humanisms, to innocent children.
Oh Tom, come on! You mean to tell us that you look at Lucy and all you see is a waste of tax dollars and secular humanism? You don't see a single clue of anything deeper than that? You expect people to take you seriously?
Your "innocent children" need to learn a bit of sober science, whether you want to learn anything yourself or not. You have NO RIGHT to deny innocent children a decent education.
Tom responded:
quote:
berberry, How is putting human hand of a chimp, educating children. If you want to educate the children put chimp hands on chimps. They are lying to the children. kjv Genesis 1:27 says were created in the image of God. When you put human hands on a chimp fossil, your lying to the children, its not sober science. Its an outright lie!
P.S. These museum curators should be promoting accurate representations of these chimps. If they refuse to, federal funding should be cut.
There have been several other substantive posts on this off-topic; I'd like to continue the discussion here. Perhaps 'Is It Science?' would be the appropriate place.
EDIT in response to AdminSylas: Tom has implied (apparently after reading Kent Hovind) that Lucy is a hoax designed to subvert innocent children into "secular humanism". The implication was regarded as off-topic by AdminPhat in the original thread. I wanted to explore Tom's assertion, but given the opposition to doing so in situ I proposed this new topic. If the admins wish to allow the discussion to continue in the other thread then this new one will be obviated and should be closed.
This message has been edited by berberry, 01-19-2005 11:49 AM

Keep America Safe AND Free!

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminSylas, posted 01-19-2005 8:52 AM berberry has not replied
 Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 01-19-2005 9:14 PM berberry has not replied
 Message 5 by arachnophilia, posted 01-19-2005 9:27 PM berberry has not replied

berberry
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 64 (179081)
01-20-2005 7:34 PM


yet again, bump for Tom
We're waiting, Tom.

Keep America Safe AND Free!

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 01-20-2005 7:56 PM berberry has replied

berberry
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 64 (179096)
01-20-2005 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by NosyNed
01-20-2005 7:56 PM


Re: Making it easy for Tom
Suits me, Ned.
Come on, Tom, who told you this stuff? We'll play nice so long as you do, but you have made an assertion which has been challenged. You do owe us an explanation of some sort.

Keep America Safe AND Free!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 01-20-2005 7:56 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024