|
Author
|
Topic: Is mans theory of human evolution clouded from the truth?
|
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6514 days) Posts: 1797 Joined: 07-12-2003
|
|
Message 16 of 31 (85984)
02-13-2004 2:06 AM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by wj
02-12-2004 10:42 PM
|
|
Well, I don't think thats a fair question WJ. After all we are talking about a race of creatures created for heavy labour, I don't think the aliens were trying to make the genes look 'pretty' as it were. After all do you complain about a tracktors paint job? As the story goes, they were intended for slave labour, it was only a bi-product of interplanetary politics that saw us rise to todays levels. I kinda like the story  It would make a neat comic book or something.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by wj, posted 02-12-2004 10:42 PM | | wj has not replied |
|
Cthulhu
Member (Idle past 5870 days) Posts: 273 From: Roe Dyelin Joined: 09-09-2003
|
|
|
Message 17 of 31 (86106)
02-13-2004 12:45 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Yaro
02-13-2004 2:06 AM
|
|
Wait... So humans were created for slave labor. The Elder Things, or Old Ones, or those big barrel/starfish aliens who made the shoggoths, or whatever the hell you want to call them used humans for slave labor. Gasp! It's true! All of it is true!
Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 16 by Yaro, posted 02-13-2004 2:06 AM | | Yaro has not replied |
|
Loudmouth
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 18 of 31 (86151)
02-13-2004 4:30 PM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by wj
02-12-2004 10:42 PM
|
|
Re: Darwin is wrong Sitchen is right
quote:
Why would a supposed superior race go to such trouble and then not fix the GLO gene while they were at it? Almost all other mammals have functional GLO genes, why retain a faulty GLO gene in the genome whihc was being created?
If humans are GLO-, then all the aliens have to do is look for the GLO- colony in their intergalactic petri dishes.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by wj, posted 02-12-2004 10:42 PM | | wj has not replied |
|
Frances
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 19 of 31 (86469)
02-15-2004 5:03 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Yaro
02-13-2004 2:06 AM
|
|
This may sound weird
...but is your first name Fred? If so, I think I know you, and would you please email me on: francesplayer@yahoo.dk? Its Eva
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 16 by Yaro, posted 02-13-2004 2:06 AM | | Yaro has not replied |
|
Gary
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 20 of 31 (87641)
02-20-2004 12:07 AM
|
Reply to: Message 13 by Annunaki
02-12-2004 10:39 PM
|
|
Re: Darwin is wrong Sitchen is right
Annunaki: I don't see what evidence there is for this. Using Google, I found the same website you copy and pasted that timeline from, and the other information on that website does not appear to be based on fact. There is no evidence, save for a few websites perhaps, that the human genome was influenced by Annunaki to create the human race as it is now. I can't find any pictures of the Emerald Tablets of Thoth either, from which that website appears to draw material - only descriptions about how they are indestructible and really old. How do you know they exist?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 13 by Annunaki, posted 02-12-2004 10:39 PM | | Annunaki has not replied |
|
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4078 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: 02-12-2003
|
|
|
Message 21 of 31 (92498)
03-14-2004 10:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Yaro
02-13-2004 2:06 AM
|
|
Personally, I thought the Sitchin books were some of the most interesting books I ever read. Totally cool. Now, if the science just worked....
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 16 by Yaro, posted 02-13-2004 2:06 AM | | Yaro has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 23 by Amlodhi, posted 03-14-2004 11:05 PM | | truthlover has not replied |
|
Itachi Uchiha
Member (Idle past 5633 days) Posts: 272 From: mayaguez, Puerto RIco Joined: 06-21-2003
|
|
|
Message 22 of 31 (92501)
03-14-2004 10:28 PM
|
|
|
Wow this stuff is really entertaining. Why dont you give a copy of this to George Lucas or Peter Jackson. You might have the next blockbuster hit on your hands. Hey Yaro you the bomb Girl youre gorgeous
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 28 by Yaro, posted 03-15-2004 12:28 PM | | Itachi Uchiha has not replied |
|
Amlodhi
Inactive Member
|
quote:
Originally posted by truthlover Personally, I thought the Sitchin books were some of the most interesting books I ever read. Totally cool.
Now, if the science just worked....
I agree 100%, truthlover, it was an appealing theory. I first became interested because, if it could be supported, it would provide some tremendous answers to many of the various artifacts (not physical artifacts) found in our religious rituals. In short, we would basically be a modern day "cargo cult". Unfortunately,(much as I "wanted to believe"), the support just isn't there. I don't read cuneiform, but I can follow the arguments of those who (really) do. Sitchin has been shown to be wildly speculative (and downright wrong) more often than not. In addition, much of his speculation derives from a highly subjective interpretation of graphic reliefs, which amounts to little more than an ancient version of the Thematic Apperception Test, in which the respondent is asked to look at "still life" drawings of people in various settings and make up a story surrounding it. Too bad, really, it was fun while it lasted. Amlodhi [This message has been edited by Amlodhi, 03-14-2004]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 21 by truthlover, posted 03-14-2004 10:06 PM | | truthlover has not replied |
|
Spencer
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 24 of 31 (92521)
03-15-2004 1:06 AM
|
|
|
You keep saying 12.21.12 Is that the same date as the mayan doomsday date?
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 25 by Dr Jack, posted 03-15-2004 7:34 AM | | Spencer has not replied |
|
Dr Jack
Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: 07-14-2003 Member Rating: 8.3
|
|
|
Message 25 of 31 (92535)
03-15-2004 7:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 24 by Spencer
03-15-2004 1:06 AM
|
|
Damn American date format (mutter, grumble) - took me a while. I believe the Mayan date 23rd December 2012, or two days out from that.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 24 by Spencer, posted 03-15-2004 1:06 AM | | Spencer has not replied |
|
neil88
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 26 of 31 (92554)
03-15-2004 10:35 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by Annunaki
02-11-2004 10:24 PM
|
|
Betting
I agree with Annunaki that the world will end on 12-21-12. I have bet $10,000 on this. But if I win, I'm not sure how I will collect.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by Annunaki, posted 02-11-2004 10:24 PM | | Annunaki has not replied |
|
Melchior
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 27 of 31 (92580)
03-15-2004 12:17 PM
|
|
|
Why the sudden jump from 126BC (2130 years ago) to 2123BC (4127 years ago)?
|
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6514 days) Posts: 1797 Joined: 07-12-2003
|
LOL. That's not me, its a photoshoped Angelina Jolie.  I actually thought I made her look funny with the bulgie eyes. Meh... go figure. Thanks for the sentiment anyway.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 29 by 1.61803, posted 03-15-2004 12:55 PM | | Yaro has not replied |
|
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1522 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: 02-19-2004
|
|
|
Message 29 of 31 (92589)
03-15-2004 12:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 28 by Yaro
03-15-2004 12:28 PM
|
|
LOL!! I thought there was something about the eyes that was (different). You are a trickster!!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 28 by Yaro, posted 03-15-2004 12:28 PM | | Yaro has not replied |
|
Spencer
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 30 of 31 (92824)
03-16-2004 7:11 PM
|
|
|
Sitchu has out-dated facts... He believes (believed?) that there was a civilization on Mars that made this 'statue'
The Nibiru civilization also helped create the other monolithic structures present on earth created by the egyptians, mayas, etc. With our technology now...
We can see he is wrong. Also, he says the Sumerian culture had predicted all of the planets in our solar system(they strangely believed that our sun was a planet along with our moon, but only our moon not any other moon orbiting another planet...). For a while, I guess you could say he was correct, but modern technology comes along and quickly dismisses this idea as we have found another planet. CNN.com - Scientists: Most distant object in solar system found - Mar 15, 2004 [This message has been edited by Spencer, 03-16-2004]
|
™ Version 4.2
