Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Seashells on tops of mountains.
Doubletime
Junior Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 05-08-2009


Message 164 of 343 (507859)
05-08-2009 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by iceage
10-01-2007 2:17 AM


I dont belive no silly flood took them there. It must have been pirates

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iceage, posted 10-01-2007 2:17 AM iceage has not replied

  
Doubletime
Junior Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 05-08-2009


Message 165 of 343 (507861)
05-08-2009 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Admin
12-03-2008 8:01 AM


Re: Topic Reminder
Yeah thoose pesky creationist are retards. I believe that it is so much more likely that pirates place them there. ARgghh me hearty.
Now for a more seriuos notes. I can't really see why this is not classified as very strong evidence that a worldwide flood that took place in the not to distant past had happend. Of this is a strong indication for the bible but from a 100 percent objective scientist it would only do as proof for a worldwide flood. Not that worldiwide flood but some flood.
But again i doubt the scientific community would support abiogenisis or Big Bang if they were 100 percent objective. But except for mountain peaks i can remember reading about shells being found in deserts to. and in my school they even have fosils of sea creatures found in desert.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Admin, posted 12-03-2008 8:01 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by Perdition, posted 05-08-2009 2:40 PM Doubletime has replied
 Message 170 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-08-2009 3:40 PM Doubletime has not replied

  
Doubletime
Junior Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 05-08-2009


Message 167 of 343 (507868)
05-08-2009 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Perdition
05-08-2009 2:40 PM


Re: Topic Reminder
Perhaps evidence is the wrong word. A more apropriate word would be indication. Since the side of this community that the evidences were against would not accept it at evidence nomatter what. Human nature.
But as far as indication is concernd
* Of course i wouldn't care if we were talking about 1 or 2 deserts or mountaint shee shells. And yes everything was coverd with water according to the bible before the first life was created. And allso according to science.
But the shells we are talking about are not millions of years old. But only a few thousands acording to dating.
* The fact that there are so many very simmulair flood storys outside the bible shows that they may have had their orgin from a true event.
* The earth is still flodded. Infact to 70 percent =P
*If the temperature went down only 3 degrees then we would say goodbie to new york that would be sooked.
* Some sea depths are 12 kilometers down. If all thoose around the world would expand themself so they become even. The water could easily go up several kilometers. Along with other geologic movements.
* There has been more than one finding of some creature freezed in ize instantly. And it is not likely to believe that some of them come from the flood.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Perdition, posted 05-08-2009 2:40 PM Perdition has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by Coragyps, posted 05-08-2009 3:07 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 169 by AdminNosy, posted 05-08-2009 3:24 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 171 by lyx2no, posted 05-08-2009 3:55 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 172 by bluescat48, posted 05-08-2009 4:01 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 173 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-08-2009 4:25 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 174 by Coyote, posted 05-08-2009 4:25 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 175 by RAZD, posted 05-08-2009 9:41 PM Doubletime has replied

  
Doubletime
Junior Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 05-08-2009


Message 176 of 343 (507928)
05-09-2009 3:06 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by RAZD
05-08-2009 9:41 PM


Re: The age of shells and the age of the organisms that made the shells
Actually. I dont believe the daiting is especially correct. But thats for another thread.
No but it is not unlikley to tink it was the flodd. Alot of them were frozen instnaly. The mammoth from sybira had grass in his mouth and looked calm.
And evolutionist explanation to how the sea shells got their is moslty guesses in the end. They can't know for sure. Lads.
My point is that believing in the flodd is not ignorant. In general scientist are closed to the crazy possibility that the flood really happend so alot of them want to find alternative explanations on diffrent matters.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by RAZD, posted 05-08-2009 9:41 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Son, posted 05-09-2009 3:16 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 178 by Son, posted 05-09-2009 3:21 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 179 by dwise1, posted 05-09-2009 4:15 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 180 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-09-2009 5:04 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 181 by RAZD, posted 05-09-2009 12:27 PM Doubletime has replied

  
Doubletime
Junior Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 05-08-2009


Message 182 of 343 (508028)
05-10-2009 2:04 AM
Reply to: Message 181 by RAZD
05-09-2009 12:27 PM


Re: The age of shells and the age of the organisms that made the shells
About the daiting i believe it is strange that the oldest scriptures are 5000s years. Scientist says the first farmers began 5000-12000 years ago. We believe the modern civilization started 5000-7000 years ago. While the Co14 method says that humans were atleast 40 000 years old... Something is not right here. I wonder what ^^
WoW you write long posts. The flood was when it rained for 40 days. I guess soem areas were more peacefull then others. nd atleast im not ignorant having read so much that evolutionist wrote.
And science is simply selectively crazy. They beleive in abogenisis wich is atleast 10^50 000 times more crazy than the flood.But doesn't believe in the flood happening in the past. I read their explanations to " all the fosils sea shells in the mountains and other stuff " that can be said to indicate the flood. But i didnt see any real evidence at all.
TBH i have read alot but im still not to wellinformed about this topic. And it stills seems that in many way the weak majority of modern scientist seek any explanation that is agaisnt the bible. In the end alot of this stuff is still upp for debatte.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by RAZD, posted 05-09-2009 12:27 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-10-2009 2:20 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 184 by Son, posted 05-10-2009 4:28 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 188 by Coyote, posted 05-10-2009 8:50 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 189 by RAZD, posted 05-10-2009 2:16 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 190 by RAZD, posted 06-21-2009 1:45 PM Doubletime has replied

  
Doubletime
Junior Member (Idle past 5413 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 05-08-2009


Message 191 of 343 (512978)
06-23-2009 6:48 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by RAZD
06-21-2009 1:45 PM


Re: The age of shells and the age of the organisms that made the shells
First of all
The flodd was supposed to have lasted for 40 days. Wich means the earth would have been coverd by water. Therefore the sea shells still with air trapped inside could easily end up in mountains and deserts.
The earth is still flodded to about 70 percent.
Several times in the history of the earth the earth has been fully coverd with water.
But nvm I would like to focus on religiuos topics now

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by RAZD, posted 06-21-2009 1:45 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by Huntard, posted 06-23-2009 7:13 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 193 by RAZD, posted 06-23-2009 8:09 AM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 194 by Taz, posted 06-23-2009 12:08 PM Doubletime has not replied
 Message 195 by roxrkool, posted 06-23-2009 8:48 PM Doubletime has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024