Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Seashells on tops of mountains.
Chuck77
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 226 of 343 (635741)
10-01-2011 5:59 AM


Coyote using an entire quote from a website for a rebuttle
Wow Coyote. I thought you were better than this. Can we do the same thing with Creationist sites? There is a TON of info I can just quote and then say what you said:
Coyote writes:
Given this, I'll stick to evidence and you can play around with logic and religious belief all you want.
Here is the message Coyote couldn't deal with on his own:
Message 141
And here is the copy and paste from Coyote:
Message 142
Nice job. It's always refreshing to know when you get stumped there are websites who will corroborate our own interpretation of things.
If I ever do this in the future, I hope you'll look at it as good debating
Cheers
Anyway, i've been going thru this thread: Trilobites, Mountains and Marine Deposits - Evidence of a flood? Im currently at your comment now. That thread is closed so I thought i'd bring it up here.
I think the sea shells atop mountains is a good argument for the flood too but it can get complicated. If we are allowed to use entire quotes like you did and just say "given this" i'll do just fine in defending my position.
When faced with a difficult comment you copied and pasted. I can do that too.

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by fearandloathing, posted 10-01-2011 6:12 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 235 by Coyote, posted 10-01-2011 9:35 AM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 228 of 343 (635746)
10-01-2011 6:23 AM


Catastrophic
Hi RAZD,
This is from the other thread
the point of this thread is to deal with the rest of the mountain of evidence, evidence that shows multiple sequences of marine growth in several diverse layers throughout the mountains, and often interspersed with sequences of non-marine life in between the layers of marine growth. How does one upheaval explain this?
Message 158
Couldn't the time it took to form the mountains, while in the process of going upward with all of the catastophic events going on have accumulated/incorporated all that marine life thoughtout the mountains while forming?
Sorry, this may seen silly to ask but im just asking. Im not done with that thread yet so bear with me.

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Granny Magda, posted 10-01-2011 6:40 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 234 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-01-2011 9:19 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 237 by roxrkool, posted 10-01-2011 12:36 PM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 239 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 2:00 AM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 229 of 343 (635747)
10-01-2011 6:25 AM
Reply to: Message 227 by fearandloathing
10-01-2011 6:12 AM


Re: Coyote using an entire quote from a website for a rebuttle
Try and click the messages I linked. Just give it a shot, it's easy. Move mouse and click.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by fearandloathing, posted 10-01-2011 6:12 AM fearandloathing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 230 by fearandloathing, posted 10-01-2011 6:29 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 231 of 343 (635749)
10-01-2011 6:30 AM
Reply to: Message 227 by fearandloathing
10-01-2011 6:12 AM


Re: Coyote using an entire quote from a website for a rebuttle
Ok, cool. Im good at confusing people usually.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by fearandloathing, posted 10-01-2011 6:12 AM fearandloathing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by fearandloathing, posted 10-01-2011 6:34 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 238 of 343 (635825)
10-02-2011 1:58 AM
Reply to: Message 237 by roxrkool
10-01-2011 12:36 PM


Re: Catastrophic
Ok, thanks roxrkool.
Im fairly confident my question was a silly one. A lot is made of this subject of seashells in Creationist circles. You hear it thrown around a lot.
Here is my dillema (if you care). I am not a geologist. I don't have any geologist training or friends who are geologists. I'm a Christian who believes there was a flood. I have these creationists sites that say there was a flood and provide tons of information to say why sea shells etc etc prove a world wide flood.
Then, there is the other side. Your side. Tonight after reading what you said, and grandma, i'll (naturally) go look for an explanation that will satisfy me about why your comments arent true.
Where does it end? Who should I believe? Maybe it was local? It confusing man.
Btw, the sea shells (marine life) argument is not listed in AIG's "arguments not to use" so I thought i'd go ahead and bring it up again ...thanks for the informed reply.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by roxrkool, posted 10-01-2011 12:36 PM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by roxrkool, posted 10-02-2011 11:51 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 240 of 343 (635827)
10-02-2011 2:15 AM
Reply to: Message 239 by RAZD
10-02-2011 2:00 AM


Re: Catastrophic
Thanks RAZD.
So what "catastrophic events" were involved? Chapter and verse?
Im gonna speculate that this is one:
KJV-Genesis7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
I just a hypothesis RAZD. Probably not even that. I can probably find some more but im not gonna bog down the thread with verses. If there was a world wide flood there would have to be more than just some rain falling for 40 days and nights I think.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 2:00 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 9:38 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 241 of 343 (635829)
10-02-2011 2:38 AM
Reply to: Message 239 by RAZD
10-02-2011 2:00 AM


Re: Catastrophic
***Rambling deleted***
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 2:00 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 242 of 343 (635830)
10-02-2011 3:54 AM
Reply to: Message 234 by Dr Adequate
10-01-2011 9:19 AM


Re: Catastrophic
Dr Adequate writes:
chuck writes:
Couldn't the time it took to form the mountains, while in the process of going upward with all of the catastophic events going on have accumulated/incorporated all that marine life thoughtout the mountains while forming?
That's not very detailed. How do you envisage this happening?
My question is not very detailed? Im sorry but it wasn't mean to be very detailed. It's Just a question.
How do I envisage my question being more detailed?
The next time I ask a simple question I will add more detail than is apperantly needed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-01-2011 9:19 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 249 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-02-2011 12:59 PM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 243 of 343 (635831)
10-02-2011 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 236 by Theodoric
10-01-2011 10:04 AM


Re: Chuck needs to learn what evidence is
Theodoric writes:
The evidence that can be presented here is usually websites.
Hmmm. I wonder if the members here feel insulted by that. I know I would. Moose, Dr A, Coyote, Pressie, roxrkool...
You think they "usually" just use websites...ok. No education? No learned knowledge? No hands on work? No memory, to name a few...Alright, if you say so. I wonder how they feel.
Im, not gonna argue with you.
So you are agreeing with me then on my post to Coyote? Great bro. thanks for the support.
Cherrio...
Theodoric writes:
Chuck needs to learn what evidence is
Cool man, websites it is
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by Theodoric, posted 10-01-2011 10:04 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 245 by Theodoric, posted 10-02-2011 8:33 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 246 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 8:42 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 251 by Pressie, posted 10-03-2011 6:55 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 244 of 343 (635839)
10-02-2011 5:17 AM
Reply to: Message 235 by Coyote
10-01-2011 9:35 AM


Re: Coyote using an entire quote from a website for a rebuttle
My commment wasn't meant to insult your intelligence in any way. Just how you choose to present that comment. I should have overlooked it as im 100 times more guilty than you in doing that.
Sorry for making a big deal out of it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by Coyote, posted 10-01-2011 9:35 AM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024