Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homo floresiensis
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1486 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 120 of 213 (197017)
04-05-2005 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Monk
04-05-2005 3:21 PM


I mean, are there practical limits to miniaturization that would tend to arrest the process? Is it conceivable, given the right evolutionary conditions, for a human species to be 1 foot tall with heads the size of walnuts?
My guess is that we couldn't get much smaller than the little rugrat over there in your avatar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Monk, posted 04-05-2005 3:21 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by RAZD, posted 04-05-2005 8:24 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 127 by Monk, posted 04-05-2005 9:27 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1486 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 128 of 213 (197095)
04-05-2005 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by Monk
04-05-2005 9:27 PM


So is there a practical limit to the reduction in the size of a species?
I'd say the juvenile cranium represents the smallest a functional human brain can be, so you'd be limited to the body that would be proportional to a brain of that size.
But then again, maybe I'm wrong. I'm having a hard time really visualizing the exact size and proportion of Homo floresiensis.
This message has been edited by crashfrog, 04-05-2005 08:38 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Monk, posted 04-05-2005 9:27 PM Monk has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024