|
Author
|
Topic: future evolution of humanity
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5051 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 21 of 34 (45177)
07-05-2003 11:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 20 by DC85
07-05-2003 11:36 PM
|
|
DC- why didnt you think of solar system exploration as de facto creating restricted human gene flow? I have never seen a calculation on the cost of biomass movement vs migration under reproduction but such approximations to more than 100yrs in the future would not be out of leisure time at some time in this life time.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by DC85, posted 07-05-2003 11:36 PM | | DC85 has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 22 by DC85, posted 07-06-2003 12:11 AM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5051 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 23 of 34 (45185)
07-06-2003 12:14 AM
|
Reply to: Message 22 by DC85
07-06-2003 12:11 AM
|
|
fine
Ok but now we would be discussing population genetics on a level that even the historians of the subject doubt is possible. Will Provine IS mistaken in this regard I know from LOOKING (not interpreting data) d if ferently at fish than I did at herps even though I tried for over a month to attempt the same perspective. (also- Gould's refusal to accredit Croizat is part of this paceled parsed use of language that Gould attempted to triangulate).
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 22 by DC85, posted 07-06-2003 12:11 AM | | DC85 has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5051 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 25 of 34 (45248)
07-06-2003 10:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 24 by DC85
07-06-2003 11:22 AM
|
|
gene flow takes TIME, spacetravel takes up this
Reproduction however requires proximity as even artifical insemination would be thusly affected. I have not made the computation/calculation I indicated. Back to you.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 24 by DC85, posted 07-06-2003 11:22 AM | | DC85 has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2