Hey man how hard is it to call someone stupid? All I did was relate what Huxley said about Neanderthals and what Einstein said about the Second Law of Thermodynamics and I was called stupid. Those were not my words so does that make Huxley and Einstein stupid? I haven't read one explanation in this forum as to why they were wrong.
The Oxford Debate was held in June 1860 at Oxford University, only seven months after the publication of Darwin's Origin of the Species. A special meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, it marked a major turning point in England, Just as the 1925 Scopes Trial would be the turning point in North America. Scientific facts had little to do with either event; both were just battles between personalities. In both instances, evolutionists won through ridicule. As far as I can determin, no scientific facts were used in the debates, at least I can't find any recorded.
Out of the sixteen members in this forum most are evolutionists and are quiet pleased to agree that I am stupid for beleiving Huxley and
Einstein about Neanderthals and The Second Law. I don't see any reason to take part in this forum if nobody will give an explanation as to why these two lions of science were wrong.
Now that we have established that I am stupid and we have that out of the way can someone use no more than two syllable words to tell me why Einstein and all physicists are wrong about the Second Law of Thermodynamics? I'm sure with such a distinguished group of evolutionists as this I will be enlightned with more than "I'm stupid for asking".
And I would like to thank the administrator for pointing out that I was being to sensitive because it dawned on me that I am in pretty good company if Einstein, Huxley and most physicists are wrong also.