Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,438 Year: 3,695/9,624 Month: 566/974 Week: 179/276 Day: 19/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does evidence of transitional forms exist ? (Hominid and other)
John
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 301 (15521)
08-16-2002 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by dents
08-16-2002 8:34 AM


quote:
Originally posted by dents:
well, i didn't get it quite .. they consider it human or apes? actually my perception is that it is a transitional form between ancient apes and modern human ..
There is no transitional form between ancient apes and modern humans.
There is a common ancestor between ancient apes and australopithicenes-- our ancestors. Chimpanzee and human lines diverged most recently.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by dents, posted 08-16-2002 8:34 AM dents has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by dents, posted 08-16-2002 12:53 PM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 301 (15728)
08-19-2002 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by dents
08-16-2002 12:53 PM


quote:
Originally posted by dents:
it appears that the turkana boy is a transitional form between ape-like common ancestor and modern human ... what is the creationist opinion about this fossil?
(should it be a human, why looking so ape-like? should it be a kind of ape, what about its human measures?)

I guess there are no creationists interested, so I'll bump it for you. Besides, I'd like to know too.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by dents, posted 08-16-2002 12:53 PM dents has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024