Racial Evolution 101

Gee, that's going to be difficult to make an argument for. How are you going to remove the effect of improved technology from the statistics? What analysis have you done so far? Where have you collected your statistics?

Redwolf: you appear to have forgottten to answer Message 36.

Your bizare idea of European history has already been critiqued.However, given the fact taht a lot of people have been killed in the 20th century, you haven't even tried to establish a connection with Darwin's work. You've just asserted one. Sorry, that doesn't cut the mustard.You need to demonstrate that Darwin's work was the cause. To do this you have to separate out the effects of better technology, coimmunications, social development, and a whole host of other factors.I can't conceive of a way that it could be done. If you can do it, go for it.But claiming that Darwin caused the many deaths after he lived is a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy; for the Latin-challenged that means that just because B happened after A, that doesn't mean that A caused B.