Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   human tails and the midriff - hiccups, what are the creatonist theories about them?
themasterdebator
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 79 (520216)
08-19-2009 11:11 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by mike the wiz
08-19-2009 6:12 AM


Prove they are descended.
All you have is a hypothetical cladogram which is nowhere near logical proof. Bare in mind only logic allows your theory to proceed.
This type of evidence that "follows" if evolution is true, is very weak, as you merely have to believe we are related, when the facts themselves do not insist this is so.
the proof they descended would be in their accurate ability to make predictions. 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent provides a good synopsis of the large body of evidence and predictions that evolution can make. Tell me, how does one test creationism? What predictions does the theory of creationism make that can be tested against reality that evolution would not make? The most important part of any scientific theory(and this is a science forum) is that it can make predictions by which the theory can be tested.
What predictions does Creationism make?
How have these predictions been tested against reality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by mike the wiz, posted 08-19-2009 6:12 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Coyote, posted 08-19-2009 11:51 PM themasterdebator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024